475
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Interplay of Familial and Individual Risk in Predicting Clinical Improvements in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages S542-S554 | Published online: 07 Jun 2018
 

Abstract

Bioecological models of developmental psychopathology underscore the role of familial experiences of adversity and children’s individual-level characteristics in heightening risk for pediatric anxiety through direct, combined, and interactive effects. To date, much of the existing research dedicated to pediatric anxiety disorders has largely been examined in bioecological models of diathesis-stress using community samples. This study extends our understanding of children’s differential responsiveness to familial adversity by examining the diathesis-stress interaction of cumulative risk and children’s individual-level vulnerabilities (negative affectivity and coping efficacy) within a clinic-referred treatment study for pediatric anxiety disorders. A cumulative risk index assessing exposure to familial adversity (e.g., socioeconomic status [SES], parent psychiatric illness) and self-reported measures of children’s negative affectivity and coping efficacy were each measured at the intake of a randomized controlled clinical trial for the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders (N = 488; 7–17 years of age). Trajectories of interviewer-rated anxiety symptoms were assessed across 12 weeks of treatment at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Consistent with models of temperamental risk for mental health problems, negative affectivity predicted higher anxiety symptoms at intake. A significant diathesis-stress interaction between cumulative risk and coping efficacy emerged, as high risk and perceptions of lower coping efficacy attenuated declines in anxiety across 12 weeks. These patterns did not differ across treatment conditions. The results indicate that for youth experiencing high levels of stress, additional treatment efforts targeting familial stressors and coping efficacy may be important in maximizing treatment outcomes.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by grants (U01MH064089 to Dr. Walkup; U01MH64092 to Dr. Albano; U01MH64003 to Dr. Birmaher; U01MH63747 to Dr. Kendall, U01MH64088 to Dr. Piacentini; U01MH064107 to Dr. Compton; T32MH073517 to Drs. Kiff and Gonzalez) from the National Institute of Mental Health. Sertraline and matching placebo were supplied free of charge by Pfizer. Views expressed within this article represent those of the authors and are not intended to represent the position of National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, or the Department of Health and Human Services. ClinicalTrials.gov Number NCT00052078.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 350.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.