Abstract
Damage to hippocampus, cerebellum, and cortex associated with cognitive functions due to anesthetic-induced toxicity early in life may cause cognitive decline later. Aquaporin 4 (AQP4), a key protein in waste clearance pathway of brain, is involved in synaptic plasticity and neurocognition. We investigated the effects of single and repeated isoflurane (Iso) anesthesia on AQP4 levels and brain damage. Postnatal-day (P)7 Wistar albino rats were randomly assigned to Iso or Control (C) groups. For single-exposure, pups were exposed to 1.5% Iso in 30% oxygenated-air for 3-h at P7 (Iso1). For repeated-exposure, pups were exposed to Iso for 3 days, 3-h each day, at 1-day intervals (P7 + 9 + 11) starting at P7 (Iso3). C1 and C3 groups received only 30% oxygenated-air. Based on HE-staining and immunoblotting (Bax/Bcl-2, cleaved-caspase3 and PARP1) analyses, Iso exposures caused a higher degree of apoptosis in hippocampus. Anesthesia increased 4-hydroxynonenal (4HNE), oxidative stress marker; the highest ROS accumulation was determined in cerebellum. Increased inflammation (TNF-α, NF-κB) was detected. Multiple Iso-exposures caused more significant damage than single exposure. Moreover, 4HNE and TNF-α contributed synergistically to Iso-induced neurotoxicity. After anesthesia, higher expression of AQP4 was detected in cortex than hippocampus and cerebellum. There was an inverse correlation between increased AQP4 levels and apoptosis/ROS/inflammation. Correlation analysis indicated that AQP4 had a more substantial protective profile against oxidative stress than apoptosis. Remarkably, acutely increased AQP4 against Iso exhibited a more potent neuroprotective effect in cortex, especially frontal cortex. These findings promote further research to understand better the mechanisms underlying anesthesia-induced toxicity in the developing brain.
Compliance with ethical standards
The investigation complies with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health and was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (approval protocol number: 2021/98, 28th July 2021).
Author contributions
HY, AŞ, SD, and EÖU conceived and designed the research. SD, AŞ, MÇ, İEE, MB, HCG, and HEP conducted experiments. AŞ analyzed the data. AŞ and SD wrote the manuscript. AŞ, SD, EÖU, and HY revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript. All data were generated in-house and, no paper mill was used.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
Data can be provided if requested.