70
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Tracking Traffic Citations Through Court Adjudications to Posting to Public Driver Records

&
Pages 93-100 | Received 01 Nov 2003, Accepted 01 Jan 2004, Published online: 11 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

Research has shown that one of the best predictors of a driver's future crash risk is the number of prior moving traffic violations (e.g., speeding). Public driver records are used by government and nongovernment users to assess drivers' future crash risks. However, the adequacy of such records may be compromised by deficient recordkeeping systems and by court-based diversion programs (e.g., probation before judgment, traffic school election) that allow drivers presumed guilty to avoid convictions in court and posting of the violations to their driver records. Using a case study approach in four jurisdictions in three states, citations issued for traffic violations were tracked through court adjudication to placement on driver records. Individual court case records and driver history records were reviewed. The percentages of citations issued that appeared on driver records were 58–87% for moving violations, 30–94% for driving while impaired (DWI), and 67–95% for occupant restraint violations. Diversion programs were a significant factor in two states, where 21% and 35% of moving violation citations resulted in diversions. Almost all court convictions in each jurisdiction were recorded on driver records, but few citations resulting in diversions were recorded. Thus, diversion programs in some jurisdictions substantially reduce the utility of public driver records as reliable indicators of prior traffic violations and future crash risks. Recordkeeping inefficiencies and errors were less important factors in this study.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

Notes

*80% of occupant restraint citations were issued for seat belt violations, and 20% were issued for child restraint violations.

*Weighted average based on proportions of adjudication category represented by each violation type.

**Weighted average based on proportions of adjudication category represented by child restraint and seat belt violations.

*98% of occupant restraint citations were issued for seat belt violations, and 2% were issued for child restraint violations.

*Weighted average based on proportions of adjudication category represented by each moving violation type.

*Weighted average based on proportions of adjudication category represented by child restraint and seat belt violations.

*All occupant restraint citations in the DHSMV summary were issued for seat belt violations.

*Sample of citations for looking up driver records included no diversion cases for DWI or occupant restraints, due to the small numbers of these cases.

*Weighted average of adjudication types.

**Sample of citations for looking up driver records did not include any diversion cases for these violation types.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 331.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.