382
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Usefulness of Off-Road Screening Tests to Licensing Authorities When Assessing Older Driver Fitness to Drive

Pages 328-335 | Received 11 Jun 2007, Accepted 22 Aug 2007, Published online: 11 Aug 2008
 

Abstract

Introduction. There is a growing interest in quick and convenient, off-road tests of fitness to drive to assist licensing authorities in identifying the minority of older drivers at heightened crash risk. Two screening tests have been identified and assessed for their usefulness in a licensing context.

Method. The research literature has been examined to identify available evaluation evidence relating to the two tests. In particular, studies that have quantified any association between test results and crash involvement in terms of relative risk have been analyzed for licensing implications.

Results. Performance on two tests—UFOV and MaryPODS—has been shown to have a consistent and statistically significant association with crash risk, including at-risk crashes. Overall, poor test performance has been associated with a two times or higher relative risk of crash involvement on both retrospective and prospective bases.

This statistical association is seen as a necessary first step in further developing off-road screening tests. It is demonstrated, however, that the tests are presently too inaccurate to be used as a form of age-based assessment on a simple pass/fail basis and would result in large numbers of older drivers being needlessly taken from the road. It is also argued that these tests may hold promise when used for preselected groups of at-risk older drivers and when used to produce a threefold outcome (“pass,” “‘fail,” and “uncertain, requiring further assessment”).

Conclusions. At this time, no off-road screening test of fitness to drive currently can be justified if applied on a simple pass/fail basis to all drivers reaching a threshold age, as the sole determinant of licensing status.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

the initial draft of this article has been substantially improved by comments from the reviewers. Their contributions are gratefully acknowledged.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 331.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.