105
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Thoracic Injury Metrics With Side Air Bag: Stationary and Dynamic Occupants

, &
Pages 433-442 | Received 16 Oct 2009, Accepted 05 Mar 2010, Published online: 20 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

Objective: Injury risk from side air bag deployment has been assessed using stationary out-of-position occupant test protocols. However, stationary conditions may not always represent real-world environments. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of torso side air bag deployment on close-proximity occupants, comparing a stationary test protocol with dynamic sled conditions.

Methods: Chest compression and viscous metrics were quantified from sled tests utilizing postmortem human specimens (PMHS) and computational simulations with 3 boundary conditions: rigid wall, ideal air bag interaction, and close-proximity air bag deployment. PMHS metrics were quantified from chestband contour reconstructions. The parametric effect of ΔV on close-proximity occupants was examined with the computational model.

Results: PMHS injuries suggested that close-proximity occupants may sustain visceral trauma, which was not observed in occupants subjected to rigid wall or ideal air bag boundary conditions. Peak injury metrics were also elevated with close-proximity occupants relative to other boundary conditions. The computational model indicated decreasing influence of air bag on compression metrics with increasing ΔV. Air bag influence on viscous metric was greatest with close-proximity occupants at ΔV = 7.0 m/s, at which the response magnitude was greater than linear summation of metrics resulting from rigid impact and stationary close-proximity interaction.

Conclusions: These results suggest that stationary close-proximity occupants may not represent the only scenario of side air bag deployment harmful to the thoraco-abdominal region. The sensitivity of the viscous metric and implications for visceral trauma are also discussed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported in part by NIH Grant (R01AG024443), the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program, and Veterans Affairs Medical Research.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 331.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.