Failed rib region prediction in a human body model during crash events with precrash braking

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this study is 2-fold. We used a validated human body finite element model to study the predicted chest injury (focusing on rib fracture as a function of element strain) based on varying levels of simulated precrash braking. Furthermore, we compare deterministic and probabilistic methods of rib injury prediction in the computational model.

Methods: The Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) M50-O model was gravity settled in the driver position of a generic interior equipped with an advanced 3-point belt and airbag. Twelve cases were investigated with permutations for failure, precrash braking system, and crash severity. The severities used were median (17 kph), severe (34 kph), and New Car Assessment Program (NCAP; 56.4 kph). Cases with failure enabled removed rib cortical bone elements once 1.8% effective plastic strain was exceeded. Alternatively, a probabilistic framework found in the literature was used to predict rib failure. Both the probabilistic and deterministic methods take into consideration location (anterior, lateral, and posterior). The deterministic method is based on a rubric that defines failed rib regions dependent on a threshold for contiguous failed elements. The probabilistic method depends on age-based strain and failure functions.

Results: Kinematics between both methods were similar (peak max deviation: ΔX_head = 17 mm; ΔZ_head = 4 mm; ΔX_thorax = 5 mm; ΔZ_thorax = 1 mm). Seat belt forces at the time of probabilistic failed region initiation were lower than those at deterministic failed region initiation. The probabilistic method for rib fracture predicted more failed regions in the rib (an analog for fracture) than the deterministic method in all but 1 case where they were equal. The failed region patterns between models are similar; however, there are differences that arise due to stress reduced from element elimination that cause probabilistic failed regions to continue to rise after no deterministic failed region would be predicted.

Conclusions: Both the probabilistic and deterministic methods indicate similar trends with regards to the effect of precrash braking; however, there are tradeoffs. The deterministic failed region method is more spatially sensitive to failure and is more sensitive to belt loads. The probabilistic failed region method allows for increased capability in postprocessing with respect to age. The probabilistic failed region method predicted more failed regions than the deterministic failed region method due to force distribution differences.

KEYWORDS:

• Active safety
• biomechanics
• brake assist
• delta V
• rib injury

Conflict of interest

F. Scott Gayzik is a member of Elemance, LLC, which distributes academic and commercial licenses for the use of GHBMC-owned computational human body models.

Acknowledgments

All simulations were run on the DEAC cluster at Wake Forest University, with support provided by Drs. David Chin and Timothy Miller.

Funding

This work was supported by Wake Forest University School of Medicine, the Global Human Body Models Consortium, LLC and NHSTA under GHBMC Project No. WFU-005.