446
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Head postures during naturalistic driving

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 637-643 | Received 14 Apr 2018, Accepted 22 Jun 2018, Published online: 27 Sep 2018
 

Abstract

Objective: A rotated head posture at the time of a rear-end impact is associated with a higher risk of acute and chronic whiplash injury. The objective of this study was to quantify the amplitude and duration of rotated head postures observed in drivers during naturalistic driving.

Methods: Twenty volunteers (14 males: 36 ± 12 years, 6 females: 27 ± 5 years) drove a 2010 Subaru Impreza on public roads while their 3D head angular position relative to the car was recorded using inertial measurement units. An experimenter rode in the passenger seat (right side) and logged when subjects performed one of 6 head movements: Bilateral shoulder and side mirror checks, looking at the rearview mirror, and looking at the front seat passenger. Video of the subjects was used to confirm the logged head movements and identify movements that the experimenter missed. The duration and amplitude of all 6 head movements were tabulated and then compared between periods when the car was moving and when the car was stationary.

Results: During a 68 ± 5-min drive, subjects performed a median (range) of 15 (5–39) left shoulder checks, 82.5 (29–167) left mirror checks, 40.5 (10–168) rearview mirror checks, 27.5 (3–113) right mirror checks, 60 (0–185) passenger looks, and 12.5 (1–28) right shoulder checks. Peak yaw angles of the head relative to the vehicle for these 6 movements averaged −81.5°, −34.3°, 16.2°, 42.1°, 58.2°, and 84.3°, respectively. Drivers spent a larger proportion of time in nonneutral postures when the vehicle was stopped (17.5%) compared to moving (8.2%) (Z = 3.92, P < .0001). Drivers also moved their head further from neutral during the movements when the car was stationary compared to moving (t19 = 5.90, P < .0001).

Conclusions: Drivers use larger and longer duration head movements when stationary than when driving. Given an increased risk of whiplash injury for initially rotated head postures, these findings provide a possible explanation for why drivers are more likely to be injured when hit from behind while their vehicle is stationary. Further, the head postures characterized in this study can be used as initial conditions in volunteer and computational studies to improve our understanding of why nonneutral head postures are associated with increased whiplash injury risk.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jeff S. Nickel for his help setting up the Razor IMU.

Disclosure statement

Gunter P. Siegmund is an employee and director and owns shares in MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists, a forensic consulting company, and he may benefit from being involved in this study. Jason B. Fice and Jean-Sébastien Blouin have nothing to disclose.

Data access

The data used in this study are unfortunately not available to other researchers due to the personal nature of the data collected, including subjects’ driving characteristics and videos.

Additional information

Funding

This work has been funded by Mitacs, MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists, and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 331.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.