162
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Communications from the AAAM 66th Annual Conference

Comparison of small female occupant model responses with experimental data in a reclined posture

, , , &
Pages S211-S213 | Published online: 12 Oct 2022
 

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the current study was to compare the GHBMC female model responses with in-house sled test data for three small female post mortem human surrogates (PMHS) at 32 km/h and a seatback recline angle of 45 degrees. The kinematics and the seatbelt forces were used to compare the female PMHS and model responses. The study aimed to identify updates that may be needed to the model.

Methods: In-house experimental sled test kinematic and seatbelt response data for the small females were obtained. The 5th female GHBMC was simulated with the same boundary conditions as in the experiments. In addition, using the PMHS computed tomography (CT) and test environment scans, the female model geometry was updated to a subject-specific model for one of the specimens, and the models were simulated to obtain 5th female and subject-specific model responses. The kinematic response and the seatbelt forces for the two models were compared with the average of the three experimental data.

Results: The head, T8 and L4 excursions, head and pelvis accelerations and seatbelt forces for the two female models were compared with the experimental data. The model responses were in agreement with the PMHS; however, the subject-specific model showed a closer agreement with the kinematic response. The subject-specific model did not submarine as in the experiments, whereas the 5th female model submarined. However, the subject-specific model showed 20% higher seatbelt forces than the PMHS.

Conclusion: This study showed that anthropometric differences may significantly alter occupant kinematics in reclined posture and need to be incorporated to investigate kinematics and injury mechanisms. The next step of the study involves incorporating age-specific material changes and investigating the subject-specific injury mechanisms. The results will be useful to develop countermeasures for autonomous vehicles.

Acknowledgments

This material is the result of work supported with resources and use of facilities at the Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center (ZVAMC), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, the Department of Neurosurgery at the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW). The authors thank the Global Human Body Models Consortium for providing the model and the Neuroscience Laboratories personnel at MCW.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 331.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.