414
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Environmental Scan of Sleep Health in Early Childhood Programs

, , , &
Pages 598-610 | Published online: 18 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Objective

To ascertain how sleep health knowledge is translated to early care and education (ECE) programs, using a multi-component environmental scan.

Methods

A website scan identified organizations’ sleep content re: recommended practices, developmental effects, and “actionable” ratings (0–2). ECE staff surveys assessed preparedness, practices, and beliefs about addressing sleep health and sleep problems in ECE programs. Semi-structured interviews with stakeholders from the ECE, pediatric and sleep communities assessed awareness, priorities, and practices at their organizations.

Results

Of 15 websites scanned, half lacked sleep content on links to development, optimal duration, or scientific background. ECE staff (n = 31) were comfortable speaking to parents about healthy sleep, and with incorporating sleep education and guidance into ECE. Stakeholders (n = 15) rated healthy sleep as a high relevance, but lower priority issue. Within ECE settings stakeholders reported that knowledge about specific links to health and development was poor and that sleep health was often obscured by “safe sleep” issues. Their recommendations included: linking sleep health to “hot topics” such as obesity or preschool suspensions and expulsions, integrating it with the teaching of routines, and raising public awareness.

Conclusion

Despite understanding that healthy sleep promotes school readiness, there is insufficiently specific, actionable information in ECE training, programs, or policies. Findings suggest a need for an awareness campaign with clear, actionable messaging, dissemination of turnkey materials, and integration with policy and professional training systems.

Trial Registration

– ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT03556462

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Hannah Ashkinaze for assistance with qualitative analyses of the stakeholder interviews.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, R01 HD082129Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01 HD082129].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 316.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.