176
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Feasibility of Screening for Sleep Problems in Early Childhood Education Programs

, , &
Pages 28-38 | Published online: 07 Feb 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives

Assess the feasibility and staff experience of screening for behavioral sleep problems (BSP) and sleep disordered breathing (SDB) in early childhood education (ECE) settings; examine BSP/SDB prevalence and caregivers’ knowledge/attitudes, perception of child sleep problems, and sleep health engagement in this sample.

Method

Eight staff representatives from four ECE sites involved with sleep problem screening procedures within a larger RCT on ECE sleep health, discussed their experiences in a focus group; transcript content reviewed. A random subset of caregiver-child dyads (n = 59) from the four ECE sites completed sleep problem measures (BSP: Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire, Short form [SF-CSHQ], Tayside Children’s Sleep Questionnaire [TCSQ-sleep disturbance and difficulty] and SDB: Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire [PSQ], in addition to RCT measures (Parent Knowledge/Attitude/Self-efficacy/Beliefs survey and sleep health goals). Caregiver sleep health engagement was measured by the sleep health goals set.

Results

ECE staff reported sleep problem screening as self-explanatory and doable but sometimes administratively burdensome. BSPs were identified in 44% (SF-CSHQ) to 63% (TCSQ-sleep disturbance) of children; SDBs in 13%. Only 11% of caregivers endorsed their child having a sleep “difficulty” (TCSQ). Sleep health goals were set by 85% of caregivers; 63% employed educational materials’ language.

Conclusion

Sleep problem screening in ECE is feasible, and problems are elicited. While caregivers readily engage in setting healthy sleep goals, few endorse sleep as difficult. ECE education could improve caregiver understanding/recognition of sleep problems.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Head Start Staff in the participating agencies in New York State as well as, the caregivers who participated in the feasibility study in addition to the RCT.

Disclosure statement

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Health under grant [R01 HD082129]. ACA was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health training grant [T32 MH019960-24] and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 316.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.