270
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Challenges and Opportunities Facing Emerging Economies

Dynamic Dependence Structure between Chinese Stock Market Returns and RMB Exchange Rates

, , &
Pages 3553-3574 | Published online: 20 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the dynamic dependence structure between the Chinese stock market and the real exchange rate of the Chinese renminbi (RMB) with unconditional and conditional copula models for the period July 22, 2005, to December 31, 2017. The results show that the crisis induced significant structural breaks, and the relationship is weak before the global financial crisis but substantially stronger after the financial crisis, regardless of whether the correlation is positive or negative. Our findings have important implications for global portfolio diversification, risk management, and China’s exchange rate policy.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ali M. Kutan and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data for this article can be accessed here.

Notes

2. The Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) is a Chinese stock exchangebased in the city of Shanghai and the largest in mainland China. The current exchange was re-established on November 26, 1990 and was in operation on December 19 of the same year. It is a non-profit organization directly administered by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC).

3. Cao, Xu, and Cao (Citation2012) discusses the Chinese exchange rate market and stock market using a multifractal detrended cross-correlations method; Nieh and Yau (Citation2010) examine the relationship between SHSE A-share prices and RMB/USD exchange rates using the conventional ECM(Error Correction Model); Rutledge, Karim, and Li (Citation2014) analyze the relationship between the RMB exchange rate and the stock market with cointegration and a Granger-causality test; Zhao (Citation2010) shows the dynamic dependence between the RMB real effective exchange rate and stock prices with VAR (Vector autoregression) and GARCH (Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity model)models.

4. Aloui, Aïssa, and Nguyen (Citation2011), Boako, Omane-Adjepong, and Frimpong (Citation2016), Caporale et al. (Citation2015), Han and Zhou (Citation2017), Lee, Doong, and Chou (Citation2011), Lin (Citation2012), Kamal and Haque (Citation2016), Reboredo, Rivera-Castro, and Ugolini (Citation2016), Sui and Sun (Citation2016), and Wong (Citation2017) among others find an increase in dependence between foreign exchange markets and financial markets.

5. See Kamal and Haque (Citation2016), Reboredo (Citation2013), and Reboredo and Ugolini (Citation2015).

6. See Cho et al. (Citation2016); Chkili, Aloui, and Nguyen (Citation2012); Griffin, Nardari, and Stulz (Citation2004); Reboredo, Rivera-Castro, and Ugolini (Citation2016); Walid et al. (Citation2011).

7. See Ang and Chen (Citation2002), and Raza et al. (Citation2016), which suggest that dependence correlation in financial markets increases in turbulent market conditions.

8. Nguyen and Bhatti (Citation2012), Ghorbel and Trabelsi (Citation2007), and McNeil and Frey (Citation2000) consider the stochastic volatility and fat-tailed nature of most financial return series using extreme value theory.

9. Examples include Lee and Yoder (Citation2007).

10. The use of linear correlation to depict the financial market dependence structure has many disadvantages, as noted by Embrechts (Citation1999).

11. Non-linear dependence structures between exchange rates and stock markets are considered by Bahmani-Oskooee and Saha (Citation2018), Chen and Chen (Citation2012), and Ho and Huang (Citation2015).

12. The choice of starting date is consistent with Dong and Yoon (Citation2017) and Nieh and Yau (Citation2010).

13. The choice similarly follows Da Silva and Vieira (Citation2017) and Yang, Li, and Zhang (Citation2014).

14. According to official timelines provided by Federal Reserve Board of St Louis (Mankiw, Citation2010) and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS, Citation2009), the timelines are separated into four phases Phase 2 is described as “sharp financial market deterioration” (September 16, 2008, to December 31, 2008) Phase 3 is defined as “macroeconomic.deterioration” (January 1, 2009, to March 31, 2009) We define the turbulent period as from September 16, 2008, to March 31, 2009, so the pre-crisis period is defined as from July 21, 2005, to September 15, 2008, for which we have o768bservations; and the post-crisis period is defined as from April 1, 2009, to December 31, 2017, for which we have 2,056 observations.

15. See Bahmani-Oskooee and Saha (Citation2018); Ehrmann et al. (Citation2014); Leung, Schiereck, and Schroeder (Citation2017); Lin (Citation2012).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (project number 2017JJ2215), the Education Planning of Hunan Province (project number XJK016BGD053), the National Social Science Foundation of China (project number 18BTJ032), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project number 71301166 and 11861042), and Ministry of Education in China Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (project number 13YJC910007).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 445.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.