Empowerment and/or Disempowerment: The Politics of Digital Media

Abstract

This article examines prevailing institutional norms that are visible in international policy discourse concerning the goals of investing in digital technologies. An analysis of policy discourse associated with the World Summit on the Information Society shows how, despite the use of terms such as “open” and “participatory,” the practice of information and communication technology project implementation displays evidence of failures to empower local people. The discussion is framed by the lessons about asymmetrical institutionalized power from theories concerned with the dynamics of techno-economic change contrasted with the prevailing market-led technology diffusion perspective. The context for the article is the experience of contributing to a high-level policy report for the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s 2013 review of progress toward knowledge societies. Examples drawn from digital technology applications are used to illustrate the asymmetrical power relations embedded in these developments.

Notes

¹ WSIS refers to the Summit in Geneva 2003 and Tunis 2005 (UN/ITU, 2003b). See United Nations (2000a) and Goal 8F. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/global.shtml

² This refers to the prediction in 1965 by Gordon Moore that the data density on integrated circuits would double approximately every 18 months supporting faster information processing.