ABSTRACT
Coffee is recognized worldwide as a top beverage owing to its several associated health benefits mediated by a complex mixture of unique bioactive substances. Chlorogenic acids are the key components of the phenolic fraction in green coffee seeds, accounting for up to 14% of the dry matter. The manufacturing of decaffeinated coffee demands efficient caffeine extraction from seeds and spent without solvent history effect for safety considerations. This has prompted researchers to investigate eco-friendly and cost-effective extraction technologies. Current extraction processes are not environmentally sustainable and have harmful consequences on humans. To date, developing a single standard method for effective extraction of certain complex compounds from coffee seeds remained a challenging procedure. The current review aims to give updated technical information regarding coffee plant green extraction methods, their advantages and disadvantages, and factors affecting efficacies for the recovery of bioactive compounds in coffee seeds and coffee spent. A comparative review of the uses of innovative green extraction techniques for coffee bioactive substances is introduced to present alternatives to conventional extraction methods. The most interesting finding was that the maximum total extractions of catechin (50.6 g/100 g) and caffeine (46.2 g/100 g) were achieved with enzymes in pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), and PLE-assisted with enzymes exhibited an enhancement in total phenolics and overall antioxidant compared to 50% hydro-ethanolic solutions. In addition, it has been claimed that the ultrasonic extraction can cut extraction time by 37% and temperature by 13%. These green extraction techniques represent favorable approaches to the exploitation of coffee chemicals as bioactives to explore their wide-reaching applications at an industrial level and for their valorization.
List of abbreviations
ABTS: 2,2 -azino-bis(3 ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid
CDOA: caffeoyl-2,7-anhydro-3-deoxy-2-octulopyranosic acid
CGA: chlorogenic acids
CGL: chlorogenic acid lactones
pCoFQA: p-coumaroylferuloylquinic acids
pCoQA; p-coumaroylquinic acids
dipCoQA: di-p-coumaroylquinic acids
pCoCQA: p-coumaroylcaffeoylquinic acids
pCoDQA: p-coumaroyldimethoxycinnamoylquinic acids
CQA: caffeoylquinic acids
diCQA: dicaffeoylquinic acids
CQL: caffeoylquinic-1,5-lactone
DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
DCQA: dimethoxycinnamoylcaffeoylquinic acid
DFQA: dimethoxycinnamoylferuloylquinic acid
DQA: dimethoxycinnamoylquinic acids
FCQA: feruloylcaffeoylquinic acids
FQA: feruloylquinic acids
diFQA: diferuloylquinic acids
GAE: gallic acid equivalent
GRAS: generally recognized as safe
HBA: hydrogen bond acceptor
HBD: hydrogen bond donor
MAE: microwave-assisted extraction
MIC: minimum inhibition concentration
NADES: natural deep eutectic solvent
OHC: oil holding capacity
PCE: powdered curcuminoid-rich extract
PHWE: pressurized hot water extraction
PLE: pressurized liquid extraction
SAS: supercritical antisolvent processes
SCG: spent coffee ground
SCQA: sinapoylcaffeoylquinic acid
SFE: supercritical fluid extraction
SWE: subcritical water extraction
TEO: turmeric essential oil
TFC: total flavonoid content
TPC: total phenolic content
UAE: ultrasonic-assisted extraction
UMAE: ultrasonic-microwave-assisted extraction
WHC: water holding capacity
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s)..