69
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Field Evaluation of Putatively Resistant Soybean Selections Against the Soybean Aphid

, , , &
Pages 76-86 | Received 22 Jun 2011, Accepted 12 Aug 2011, Published online: 17 Jan 2012
 

Abstract

The soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, has become a serious pest of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in North America, and host-plant resistance is one potential management tool. In the current study, various F2-derived soybean selections with the Rag1 gene for resistance to soybean aphid were evaluated among F2-derived soybean selections without Rag1 and among contemporary soybean lines in a two-year field test. Overall, aphid levels per plant were over tenfold greater in 2006 than in 2005, but lines generally performed similarly relative to one another between years with regard to aphid-infestation levels. In both years, the Rag1 selections ILL4, ILL27, ILL35, ILL37, ILL64RR, ILL76RR, and ILL77RR had the lowest mean number of soybean aphids per plant. In 2005, three putative Rag1 selections—ILL26, ILL67RR, and ILL87—had intermediate aphid infestation levels greater than those of other Rag1 selections, and in 2006 ILL26 and ILL67RR also had intermediate aphid levels that did not differ from all other lines. Irrespective of the Rag1 gene, all soybean lines tested in 2006 had potentially injurious infestations ( 799 soybean aphids per plant) that exceeded action thresholds for this pest. These results show varying levels of resistance among lines homozygous for the Rag1 resistance allele and that protection may be equivocal in years of heavy infestation by soybean aphid. Implications for testing putatively aphid-resistant soybean selections in the field and the potential for field deployment of aphid-resistant lines are discussed.

Acknowledgments

This article is a contribution of USDA-ARS in cooperation with the South Dakota State Experiment Station and University of Illinois Experiment Station. The article reports the results of research only and is not subject to U.S. copyright law. Mention of trade names or commercial products is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.