217
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evaluating Cercospora leaf blight resistance in soybean accessions using an improved categorical disease-evaluation scale

, , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 679-699 | Received 03 Dec 2019, Accepted 14 Dec 2020, Published online: 21 Jan 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Cercospora leaf blight (CLB), caused by Cercospora kikuchii, C. cf. flagellaris, and C. cf. sigesbeckiae, is a serious disease of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], which is prevalent in the mid-southern and southeastern USA, where hot and humid conditions prevail during the growing season. Few resistant soybean cultivars have been identified, as previous evaluations across time and location have been notoriously inconsistent because of variable pathogen diversity and environmental conditions. To confound management options, the pathogens have developed resistance to quinone outside inhibitor fungicides and fungicides that contain thiophanate-methyl as an active ingredient. Soybean accession lines (n = 568), representing maturity groups III to VII, were planted across the southeastern USA and evaluated for the presence and severity of naturally infected CLB during 2016 and 2017 based upon multiple evaluation scales. Good correlations between symptom types allowed for unification of multiple scales into a single evaluation scale that was used in 2018. Evaluation scales were converted to categorical data and compared to search for accessions that exhibited consistent resistance to the disease. In this study, >50 accessions were identified with resistance to CLB. In addition, a new evaluation scale described herein allows for fast and accurate evaluation of large-scale field experiments for CLB across multiple locations.

Acknowledgments

The current study was supported by funding from the United Soybean Board, the Mid-South Soybean Board, and individual state commodity boards. The authors thank the numerous technicians that assisted with the project.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the United Soybean Board [2120-172-0126].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.