109
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Phenotypic reactions of 53 soybean genotypes to infection with each of 16 isolates of Phakopsora pachyrhizi

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 25-39 | Received 29 Sep 2020, Accepted 13 Mar 2021, Published online: 28 Mar 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Soybean rust, caused by the fungal pathogen Phakopsora pachyrhizi, is an economically significant disease for soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) production throughout the world. Genes for resistance to P. pachyrhizi (Rpp) have been identified at multiple loci in the soybean genome, but each conditions resistance to specific P. pachyrhizi isolates rather than providing broad resistance to the species. Identifying soybean cultivars with previously unidentified Rpp genes, combined with efforts to breed soybean containing multiple Rpp genes, is a key part of the ongoing strategy to manage the disease and minimize its economic impact. Fifty-three soybean genotypes, possessing known and unknown Rpp genes, were challenged with 16 P. pachyrhizi isolates from a global collection. The observed phenotypic reaction patterns provided insight into the presence of Rpp genes. This study tentatively confirms the presence of Rpp1b, or an allele, in eight soybean lines, of previously unknown resistance gene, and in another three lines produced by targeted breeding. Examples of resistance gene pyramiding were identified in lines 4014–242-341 and 4018-4-1-1-212, which may contain both Rpp2 and Rpp4 genes and line RN6-313-362, which may contain both Rpp1b and Rpp4. Three possible sources of new resistance genes may exist within GC00138-29, PI 567145 C, and PI 605833. This study provides preliminary information on potential new sources of soybean-rust-resistance that may be used to focus specific future research and inform breeding programs.

Acknowledgments

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by USDA-ARS Projects 8044-22000-046-00D and 6066-21220-014-00D.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.