503
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Artificially roughened solar air heater: A comparative study

&
Pages 143-172 | Published online: 02 Mar 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Artificially roughened solar air heater has been topic in research for the last 30 years. Prediction of heat transfer and fluid flow processes of an artificially roughened solar air heater can be obtained by three approaches: theoretical, experimental, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). This article provides a comprehensive review of the published literature on the investigations of artificially roughened solar air heater. In the present article, an attempt has been made to present holistic view of various roughness geometries used for creating artificial roughness in solar air heater for heat transfer enhancement. This extensive review reveals that quite a lot of work has been reported on design of artificially roughened solar air heater by experimental approach but only a few studies have been done by theoretical and CFD approaches. Finally this article presents a comparative study of thermo-hydraulic performance of 21 different types of artificial roughness geometries attached on the absorber plate of solar air heater in terms of thermo-hydraulic performance parameter. Heat transfer and friction factor correlations developed by various investigators for different types of artificially roughened solar air heaters have also been reported in this article.

Nomenclature

A=

area of cross-section, mm2

AP=

surface area of absorber plate, mm2

B=

air gap, mm

Cp=

specific heat of air, J/kg K

D=

equivalent or hydraulic diameter of duct, mm

d=

print diameter of dimple/protrusion or geometric parameter of broken rib, mm

e=

rib height, mm

g=

groove position/ width of gap, mm

Gt=

global solar irradiance

H=

depth of duct, mm

h=

heat transfer coefficient, W/m2 K

I=

intensity of solar radiation, W/m2

k=

thermal conductivity of air, W/mK

L=

length of text section of duct, mm

l=

longway length of mesh, mm

L1=

inlet length of duct, mm

L2=

test length of duct, mm

L3=

outlet length of duct, mm

m=

mass flow rate, kg/s

P=

pitch, mm

Pm=

mechanical energy consumed for propelling air through collector, W

Ql=

heat loss from collector, W

Qt=

heat loss from top of collector, W

qu=

useful heat flux, W/m2

Qu=

useful heat gain, W

S=

length of discrete rib or shortway length of mesh, m

Ta=

ambient temperature, K

Tam=

mean air temperature, K

Ti=

fluid inlet temperature, K

To=

fluid outlet temperature, K

Tpm=

mean plate temperature, K

UL=

overall heat loss coefficient, W/m2 K

v=

velocity of air in the duct, m/s

W=

width of duct, mm

w=

width of rib, mm

ΔP=

pressure drop, Pa

Dimensionless parameters

=

average Nusselt number

=

average Stanton number

=

average friction factor

B/S=

relative roughness length

d/w=

relative gap position

e/D=

relative roughness height

e/H=

rib to channel height ratio

e+=

roughness Reynolds number

f=

fanning friction factor

Fr=

collector heat removal factor

fr=

fanning friction factor for rough surface

fs=

fanning friction factor of smooth surface

g=

heat transfer function

g/e=

relative gap width

g/P=

relative groove position

Gd/Lv=

relative gap distance

L/D=

test length to hydraulic diameter ratio of duct

l/e=

relative logway length of mesh

l/s=

relative length of grit

Nu=

Nusselt number

Nur=

Nusselt number for rough channel

Nus=

Nusselt number for smooth channel

P/e=

relative roughness pitch

P’/P=

relative roughness staggering ratio

Pr=

Prandtl number

R=

roughness function

Re=

Reynolds number

S/e=

relative short way length of mesh

S’/S=

relative roughness segment ratio

St=

Stanton number

W/H=

duct aspect ratio

W/w=

relative roughness width

Greek symbols

(τα)e=

effective transmittance-absorptance product

ɸ=

wedge angle/chamfer angle, degree

α=

angle of attack, degree

α/90°=

relative angle of attack

δ=

transition sub-layer thickness, mm

ε=

dissipation rate, m2/s3

ηeff=

effective efficiency of solar air heater

ηm=

efficiency of electric motor

ηp=

efficiency of pump

ηth=

thermal efficiency/efficiency of thermal conversion of power plant

ηtr=

efficiency of electric transmission from power plant

κ=

turbulent kinetic energy, m2/s2

μ=

dynamic viscosity, Ns/m2

ρ=

density of air, kg/m3

ω=

specific dissipation rate, 1/sec

Subscripts

a=

ambient

am=

air mean

b=

bottom plate

c=

collector

f=

fluid

i=

inlet

l=

loss

m=

motor

o=

outlet

p=

pump

pm=

plate mean

r=

roughened

s=

smooth

t=

top

th=

thermal

tr=

transmission

u=

useful

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 405.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.