Effect of Nano-Clay and Jute Varieties on the Structural, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of Polyester Composite

ABSTRACT

Two varieties of jute fiber, tossa (Corchorus olitorius) and white (Corchorus capsularis), were combined with nano-clay (montmorillonite clay) modified polyester to fabricate composites using the hand lay-up method. The goal was to examine the impact of nano-clay on structural, mechanical, and thermal properties. The two types of jute fibers were first treated with NaOH, and the polyester was then modified with montmorillonite nano-clay (1, 2, 3) (wt%). Finally, 30 cm long unidirectional fibers were used to fabricate a composite (fiber volume fraction is 19.3%). Accordingly, the structural (crystallinity), mechanical, and thermal properties of the composite were examined using the XRD, UTM, and TGA apparatus. Regarding crystallinity, treating the tossa jute fiber and its composite with nano-clay demonstrated improved crystallinity indices of 75.24% and 75.52%. The Tossa jute fiber composite treated with 1% nano-clay exhibits an increased tensile strength of 97.8805 MPa, which is 10.92% higher than the treated fiber without NC, and a flexural strength of 159.79 MPa, which is 3.12% higher than the treated fiber without NC). In comparison to white jute composite, the treated tossa jute fiber composite showed improved thermal stability; the addition of 3% nano-clay also demonstrated higher thermal stability. The use of modified polyester in composites along with nano-clay produces better outcomes in every way.

摘要

将两种黄麻纤维tossa（Corchore olitorius）和白色（Corchores capsularis）与纳米粘土（蒙脱石粘土）改性聚酯结合，采用手工铺层法制造复合材料. 目的是研究纳米粘土对结构、机械和热财产的影响. 两种类型的黄麻纤维首先用NaOH处理，然后用蒙脱土纳米粘土（1，2，3）（wt%）对聚酯进行改性。最后，使用30 cm长的单向纤维制造复合材料（纤维体积分数为19.3%）. 据此，使用XRD、UTM和TGA仪器检查了复合材料的结构（结晶度）、机械和热财产. 关于结晶度，经处理的黄麻纤维及其与纳米粘土的复合材料的结晶度指数提高了75.24%和75.52%. 用1%纳米粘土处理的Tossa黄麻纤维复合材料的拉伸强度增加了97.8805MPa，比未经NC处理的纤维高10.92%，弯曲强度增加了159.79MPa，比未经过NC处理的光纤高3.12%）. 与白黄麻复合材料相比，经处理的tossa黄麻纤维复合材料表现出更好的热稳定性; 3%纳米粘土的加入也显示出较高的热稳定性. 在复合材料中使用改性聚酯和纳米粘土在各个方面都能产生更好的效果.

KEYWORDS:

• Tossa (Corchorus olitorius)
• white (Corchorus capsularis)
• nano-clay
• tensile and flexural strength
• crystallinity

关键词:

• 白色
• 纳米粘土
• 拉伸和弯曲强度
• 结晶度

Introduction

Global awareness of environmental and economic considerations increases the demand for natural fibers, including jute, as they are bio-degradable and nontoxic. Currently, the world is concerned about the use of artificial products, which are non-biodegradable and cause serious pollution problems. Natural fiber-reinforced materials are in demand due to their high strength, eco-friendly, renewable, availability, low cost, and biodegradability compared with synthetic fiber (Gon et al. 2013; Kumar et al. 2018; Munshi et al. 2020; Raghavendra, Shakuntala Ojha, and Pal 2014). Natural fiber jute is also important in engineering, textile, technical textile, geo-textile, automobile (Alves et al. 2010), and electrical industries (Pandey et al. 2010).

Among various lignocellulose fibers, jute is a widely used reinforcement material (Shahinur et al. 2022). The jute is a long and coarse fiber. Furthermore, the hydrophilic behavior of jute fibers induces poor interfacial bonding with the hydrophobic resins, which leads to poor mechanical properties. To decrease hydrophilic behavior, moisture absorption and increase surface roughness through surface treatment of jute fibers, appropriate chemicals are used (Gopinath, Kumar, and Elayaperumal 2014; Sathishkumar et al. 2017). In this context, sodium hydroxide- (NaOH-) treated natural fiber polymer composites showed higher mechanical strength, better thermal stability, and lower water absorption rate due to improved interfacial adhesion between the fiber and matrix (Doan, Brodowsky, and Mäder 2012; Londhe, Mache, and Kulkarni 2016). Therefore, the selection of chemical treatment is important as alkali treatment for surface modification.

Natural fibers can be obtained from different parts of the plant like the stem, leaf, seed, and fruit (Chandramohan and Marimuthu 2011). Jute is a natural lignocellulosic fiber of two varieties: white jute and tossa jute belong to the Tiliaceae Corchorus family (Duan, Weidong, and Zhaoling 2017). Figure 1 shows the differences between tossa and white jute. The mechanical and physical properties of jute are highly inconsistent and depend on its variety, age, fiber extraction method, and geographical area (Babu et al. 2020). Although there are variations in chemical composition, physical properties, and mechanical properties of the varieties, it is necessary to investigate whether there are any differences following chemical alteration and their reinforced composite.

Figure 1. Tossa and white jute fruits, leaves and fiber. (Marrot et al. 2013; Roy International Jute Study Group, Sudripta 2010).

Hemicellulose and lignin are fully amorphous, in contrast to the well-known cellulose structure of the fibers, which has crystalline and amorphous sections. The cellulose crystalline region contains a strong hydroxyl group (Kabir, 2013). The amorphous hemicellulose and lignin can be removed by acid and alkali treatments (Corrales et al. 2007; B. Wang, Sain, and Oksman 2007; Özgür Seydibeyoǧlu and Oksman 2008). Therefore, the crystallinity of the two types should be measured following chemical alteration, as this impacts the composite strength. Sayeed and Paharia (2019) showed that NaOH-treated jute fiber reinforced polymer composite showed better mechanical properties. Nano-clay has additional reinforcement to enhance the properties of the composites. Nano-clay also exhibits higher thermal, tensile, flexural, and impact strength (Hossain et al. 2011b). Ramakrishnan et al. (2019) used 1 to 7 wt% nano-clay and found better thermal and mechanical properties. Hasan, Sazib Mollik, and Mahbubur Rashid (2018) showed that 5% of the added nano-clay samples showed better thermal stability. The effect of montmorillonite nano-clay addition and chemical treatment on structural, mechanical, and thermal properties of tossa and white jute species reinforced composite is not studied yet. Two varieties of jute fibers are treated with NaOH; thereafter, they are incorporated into the polyester (nano-clay modified) according to hand layup, and their structural, mechanical, and thermal properties are analyzed.

Materials and methods

Materials

Two types of jute species, tossa jute and white jute, were collected from Faridpur regional station, BJRI, Bangladesh. For chemical treatment, NaOH was purchased from Merck, Germany . As a matrix material, an unsaturated polyester resin of orthophthalic grade was used from a local market. The resin (268BQTN™) was supplied by Singapore Highpolymer Chemicals Products Pte Ltd. Methyl Ethyl Ketone Peroxide (MEKP) (Butanox M-50) is used as a hardener supplied by PT. Kawaguchi Kimia, Indonesia. Organically modified montmorillonite clay (nano-clay, Nanomer™® 1.31PS) was procured from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Milot paper was procured from a local market for quick mold release after curing. The specification of used materials is listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Specification of unsaturated polyester resin, catalyst, nano-clay, and NaOH.

Materials Name	Parameter/Elements	Value/grade
Polyester	Appearance	Pink
	Specific gravity at 30°C	1.2 (1.32 when cured)
	Viscosity	400–600 mPs
	Peck exothermic temperature	135–155°C
	Stability in the dark below 25°C	6 months
	Acid value	20–24 mgk^oH/g (Styrenated resin)
	Density	1.15 gm/cm^3
	Tensile Strength	27–35 MPa
Catalyst (MEKP)	Density	1.17 gm/cm^3
	Specific gravity at 20°C	1.128 gm/ml
Nano-clay	Aminopropyltriethoxysilane	0.5–5 wt.%
	Octadecylamine	15–35 wt.%
	Modulus	170 GPa
NaOH	Physical Form	Pellets
	Molecular Weight	40 g/mol

Methods

Alkali (NaOH) treatment

The alkaline treatment increases the surface roughness of jute fibers, which results in better mechanical properties and thermal stability (Zafar, Nath Maiti, and Kumar Ghosh 2016). According to Dewan et al. (2013) in this experiment, both the tossa and white jute fiber varieties were cut into 30 cm in length and soaked in a 5% (wt% of fiber) NaOH solution at 30°C for 2 hours. The fibers were then washed out several times with distilled water to remove redundant alkali leached in the fiber. The washed fibers were dried at room temperature for 8 hours.

Composite fabrication process

There are different methods of composite fabrication. Hot press, injection molding, extrusion, and hand lay-up techniques are the most widely used (Fazlar et al. 2020; Sayeed et al. 2021; Sweety, Hasan, and Julfikar 2021). Therefore, among them, fabrication technique selection is an important issue (Sayeed, Abu, and Haider 2020). The hand layup method was used to prepare jute fiber reinforced modified polyester composite. Two stainless steel plates of square shape, each having dimensions 300 mm × 300 mm × 3 mm, were used as molds to fabricate samples of the same size, and thickness varies between 3 and 3.2 mm. Nano-clay at a different weight percentage of matrix weight (1%, 2%, and 3%) was added slowly to the unsaturated polyester resin, and then agitation was done mechanically for 2 hours. The modified polyester and catalyst (MEKP) ratio was 1:0.01. For defect-free composite fabrication, care was taken to avoid the formation of bubbles. The subsequent fabrication process consisted of first putting a Milot paper on the surface of a stainless-steel plate, which was coated with a layer of catalyzed resin. The reinforcing tossa and white jute fiber were placed on the sticky surface individually and saturated with more resin. Catalyzed resin coating was poured on the top to ensure good surface finishing. The top was then covered with a Milot paper, and the total system was manually rolled with a steel rod roller. Then, another stainless-steel plate and 10 lb weight were placed on the system, which creates 494.41 Pa pressure on the system for better curing and thickness control. It was left for 24 hours to cure at room temperature. Fiber volume fraction of both treated and untreated raw jute fibers was 19.3% for each specimen. Test samples were properly prepared according to ASTM specifications to perform tests. The composite fabrication process is given in Figure 2a. Figures 2b and 2c show the samples for tensile and flexural strength tests.

Figure 2. Composite fabrication process of jute-polyester with nano-clay.

X-ray diffraction analysis

In this study, Rigaku SmartLab SE’s XRD system was utilized to determine the crystallinity of jute fiber and nano-clay-modified composite. Jute fiber’s crystalline phases were identified and measured using X-ray diffraction (XRD), a technique that tracks the diffraction of X-rays after they interact with the sample. The sample was target with Cu-kα radiation (wavelength of the incident ray, λ = 1.544 A). The scattered radiation was detected in a 2θ (angle between the incident and reflected beam) range of the axis (10–80°), and the rotation of the detector was 2°/min. The voltage and current were 40 kV and 30 mA, respectively. The XRD deconvolution method was used to determine the relative crystallinity index (CI) (Park et al. 2010). The Gaussian function was used in Origin Pro 9.0 software to measure the peak areas. CI was measured using equation (1)(1) $\mathit{CI}\mathrm{\%}=\frac{A_c}{A_t}\times 100$(1) (Correia and Sanches Valera 2019).

(1) $\mathit{CI}\mathrm{\%}=\frac{A_c}{A_t}\times 100$(1)

where A_c is the sum of the peak areas corresponding to the crystalline structure and A_t is the total area of the XRD curve.

Mechanical properties

Tensile and flexural properties of jute-polyester composites with nano-clay were conducted using Instron Universal Testing Machine. For the tensile test, specimens were prepared using a CNC router machine with dimensions of 165 mm × 12.7 mm × 3.2 mm according to ASTM D 638–03. In flexural testing, three-point bending was performed at room temperature on a specimen of 127 mm × 12.7 mm × 3.2 mm and span length of 60 mm according to the dimensions of ASTM D 790–03. Five samples from each category were tested to obtain the average result. The strain rate was 0.001 mm/mm per second and 0.0026 mm/mm per second for tensile and flexural tests, respectively.

Thermo-gravimetric (TGA) analysis

To identify composites with improved thermal stability, thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out with nano-clay loaded for both tossa and white jute fiber-reinforced composites using ELTRA thermostep, thermo-gravimetric analyzer. Chemically treated jute fiber of both varieties of nano-clay modified polyester composites were subjected to TGA with high purity nitrogen under a constant rate of 5 ml/min, sample purge flow of 60 ml/mm, and balance purge flow of 40 ml/mm. Thermal decomposition for each sample occurred in a programmed temperature range of 30–600°C. Three samples from different parts of the fabricated composites for each category were tested.

Results and discussions

Effect of two jute varieties on the crystallinity

The crystallinity of natural fiber composites represents their strength and rigidity. Tossa jute’s determined crystallinity value is slightly higher than that of the white jute variety. Natural plant fibers are less crystalline compared to crystal materials, and the positions of peaks are a function of the source of the natural plant fiber. Tossa and white fibers have slightly different chemical compositions, and this is reflected in their crystallinities as well. Clearly Resolve Deflected peaks for two varieties are of different numbers according to raw material (jute and nano-clay modified jute polyester composite). The diffraction patterns of both treated and untreated tossa and white fiber are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. XRD pattern of treated and untreated white and tossa fiber.

From Figure 3, the peaks at 2θ = 15.6° (101), 17.1° (10$\bar{1}$), 33.5° (002), and 35° (040) are for the crystallinity nature of the fiber. Table 2 represents the CIs of fibers and composites. Figure 3 indicates that, in comparison to white jute fiber, tossa jute fiber has higher intensity and narrower peaks. Moreover, from Figure 3 it is clear that treated fibers of both varieties show narrower and higher peaks compared to untreated jute fibers. Similar results were published by Mwaikambo and Ansell (2002), W. Ming Wang et al. (2009) and Zafar, Nath Maiti, and Kumar Ghosh (2016).

Table 2. Crystallinity index of untreated, treated tossa and white fiber.

Sample Name	Untreated Tossa Fiber	Treated Tossa Fiber	Untreated White Fiber	Treated White Fiber
Crystallinity	71.23	75.24	70.69	73.62

XRD patterns for both varieties, treated and untreated fiber composites with (3%) nano-clay and without nano-clay, are shown in Figures 4 and 5, accordingly.

Figure 4. XRD pattern of treated and untreated tossa fiber composite with and without nano-clay.

Figure 5. XRD pattern of treated and untreated white fiber composite with and without nano-clay.

From Figures 4 and 5 it is clear that the peaks of treated fiber composites are higher and narrower compared to untreated fiber composites. the peaks of the tossa fiber composite are higher and narrower compared to the white fiber composite. Peaks near 2θ = 24° and 44° are for crystalline properties of composites. The crystallinity index is measured according to equation 1(1) $\mathit{CI}\mathrm{\%}=\frac{A_c}{A_t}\times 100$(1) . Table 3 presents that the crystallinity of untreated fiber composites is lower compared to treated fiber composites. Imposing nano-clay in composites increases crystallinity. Hasan, Sazib Mollik, and Mahbubur Rashid (2018), Hossain et al. (2011a) showed that jute composite with nano-clay shows better crystallinity which is similar to our results.

Table 3. Crystallinity index of different tossa composite and white composite.

Sample Name	Crystallinity	Sample Name	Crystallinity
UT T Composite without NC	58.98	UT T Composite with NC	73.85
UT W Composite without NC	56.67	UT W Composite with NC	70.71
T T Composite without NC	59.68	T T Composite with NC	75.52
T W Composite without NC	57.96	T W Composite with NC	72.99

Tensile properties analysis

The composites were prepared using treated and untreated fibers of both jute varieties to assess the impact of nano-clay. Five samples from each category (without nano-clay and with 1%, 2%, and 3% nano-clay) were subjected to tensile tests. The stress–strain curve of one sample from each category is shown in Figures 6a (tossa) and Figure 6b (white). Figures 7 (tossa) and Figure 8 (white) represent the average tensile strength of five samples from each category.

Figure 6. Tensile stress–strain curves of different tossa composite.

Figure 7. Tensile strength of untreated and treated tossa fiber.

Figure 8. Tensile strength of untreated and treated white fiber.

For tossa and white fiber, according to Figures 6a and 6b, composite made of treated fiber exhibits greater tensile strength than an untreated fiber composite. Additionally, composite with 1% nano-clay exhibits better tensile strength for both tossa and white fiber. The Tossa fiber composite has higher tensile strength than the white fiber composite in the variety comparison.

We have discovered a tensile strength of 72.55 ± 15.5 MPa for a composite made of 19.3% (fiber volume fraction) untreated fiber, whereasBhowmick (2015) discovered a tensile strength of 80 ± 13.39 MPa for a composite built of 25% fiber. Due to the inherent variation of single jute fiber and the composites are fabricated by the hand lay-up method, the distribution of fibers in the matrix was not perfectly uniform and parallel to each other, tensile strength varies. Ramakrishnan et al. (2019) found 103.05 MPa tensile strength for a composite made of 5% nano-clay and 20% fiber of 30 mm length and epoxy resin, whereas we found 97.88 MPa tensile strength for a composite made of 1% nano-clay and 19.3% (fiber volume fraction) fiber of 30 cm length and polyester resin. Here, the difference is due to fiber length and orientation and matrix material.

Flexural properties analysis

Figures 6c and 6d display the flexural load vs. deflection for both tossa and white fiber composites. Figures 9, and 10 illustrate variations in flexural strength for both variants of untreated and treated fiber with and without nano-clay.

Figure 9. Flexural strength of untreated and treated tossa fiber.

Figure 10. Flexural strength of untreated and treated white fiber.

As shown in Figures 6c and 6d, for tossa and white fiber, a composite composed of treated fiber has a higher flexural strength than one produced of an untreated fiber. Furthermore, the flexural strength for both tossa and white is improved in the composite with 1% nano-clay. In a variety of comparisons, white fiber composite is less flexural-stable than tossa fiber composite.

Hasan and Sazib Mollik (2015) used a hand lay-up method to test a jute fiber polyester composite containing (1–3)% nano-clay. They discovered that adding 1% nano-clay improved the composite’s flexural strength while adding more nano-clay reduced it. We get 17.49% higher flexural strength than Hasan and Sazib Mollik (2015).

Thermo-gravimetric analysis

TGA analysis was performed to investigate the thermal stability of prepared composites with and without nano-clay. For tossa and white jute fiber composites, Figures 11 and 12 depict the temperature vs. percentage of remaining weight.

Figure 11. TGA of tossa fiber composite without and with nano-clay.

Figure 12. TGA of white fiber composite without and with nano-clay.

There are three significant regions of weight loss due to the temperature rise. The initial weight loss of composites at low temperatures is due to moisture removal. The maximum weight loss due to degradation and volatilization of polyester and nano-clay along with jute fibers present in composites. Finally, at the end of the decomposition at around 600°C, the ash content remained (Hasan, Sazib Mollik, and Mahbubur Rashid 2018). The thermal stability of every type of sample has not changed significantly, as shown by Figures 11 and 12.

The Tossa jute composite showed better thermal stability than the white fiber composite, according to Table 4. The composite of nano-clay-modified polyester showed slightly improved thermal stability. From Table 4, the composite of treated tossa fiber with 3% nano-clay lost 75% of its weight at 422°C, whereas without nano-clay, the temperature was 416°C.

Table 4. Thermo gravimetric data for tossa and white jute composite after treatment.

Sample ID	75% Weight loss temperature ^oC		(95–98)% Weight loss temperature ^oC
	Without NC	With 3% NC	Without NC	With 3% NC
Untreated Tossa Jute Composite	411°C	417°C	575.7°C	637°C
Treated Tossa Jute Composite	416°C	422°C	642.6°C	645°C
Untreated White Jute Composite	406°C	411°C	572°C	636°C
Treated White Jute Composite	410°C	418°C	637°C	641°C

According to Hasan, Sazib Mollik, and Mahbubur Rashid (2018) the composite with 5% nano-clay showed a final breakdown between 416°C and 460°C, while we discovered that the 3% nano-clay composite showed a final decomposition between 420°C and 500°C.

Conclusions

The composites of both varieties were fabricated using the hand lay-up technique for treated and untreated fibers with and without nano-clay. After that, the structural, tensile, flexural, and thermal properties were examined. These properties were tested to determine how the addition of nano-clay and NaOH treatment affected the unidirectional single-fiber polyester composite. As a structural property, the crystallinity index was determined. Treated tossa jute fiber and its composite with nano-clay showed increased crystallinity indices of 75.24% and 75.52%. The tossa jute fiber composite treated with 1% nano-clay exhibits increased tensile (97.8805 MPa) and flexural strength (159.97 MPa). The thermal stability of the treated tossa jute fiber composite and the addition of 3% nano-clay were both higher than that of the white jute composite, respectively. Composites that incorporate modified polyester with nano-clay get better results overall. So we can conclude that nano-clay modified polyester composite was found mechanically stronger and thermally stable that can be safely utilized in the automobile sector, railway wagon interiors, kitchen cabinets, and school furniture in place of non-degradable plastic and plastic-based composites. We believe that this is the direction to head toward better materials.

Highlights

• The importance of this article is associated with which varieties of jute fibers are suitable for reinforced nano-clay modified polyester composites.

• This article also reveals the crystallinity index of both jute fiber varieties and their composites, which will help to choose better crystalline fibers and composites on purpose.

• The result of tossa reinforced nano-clay modified polyester composite shows higher tensile and flexural strength compared to white reinforced nano-clay modified polyester composites.

• TGA result of 3% nano-clay loaded treated tossa fiber reinforced polyester composite showed better thermal stability.

Ethical approval

I confirm that all the research meets ethical guidelines and adheres to the legal requirements of the study country.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Professor Dr. Md. Abu Hasan Bhuiyan, Pro Vice-Chancellor of UITS and also thank Md. Moslem Uddin, Director of Technology Wing of BJRI for technical support. The authors would also like to thank the BJRI staff for their assistance during the field data collection and characterization of jute fibers.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Not applicable.