Aerosol Generation by Blower Motors as a Bias in Assessing Aerosol Penetration into Cabin Filtration Systems

Abstract

In cabin filtration systems, blower motors pressurize a vehicle cabin with clean filtered air and recirculate air through an air-conditioning evaporator coil and a heater core. The exposure reduction offered by these cabins is evaluated by optical particle counters that measure size-dependent aerosol concentration inside and outside the cabin. The ratio of the inside-to-outside concentration is termed penetration. Blower motors use stationary carbon brushes to transmit an electrical current through a rotating armature that abrades the carbon brushes. This creates airborne dust that may affect experimental evaluations of aerosol penetration. To evaluate the magnitude of these dust emissions, blower motors were placed in a test chamber and operated at 12 and 13.5 volts DC. A vacuum cleaner drew 76 m ³ /hour (45 cfm) of air through HEPA filters, the test chamber, and through a 5 cm diameter pipe by a vacuum cleaner. An optical particle counter drew air through an isokinetic sampling probe and measured the size-dependent particle concentrations from 0.3 to 15 μm. The concentration of blower motor aerosol was between 2 × 10 ⁵ and 1.8 × 10 ⁶ particles/m ³ . Aerosol penetration into three stationary vehicles, two pesticide application vehicles and one tractor, were measured at two conditions: low concentration (outside in the winter) and high concentration (inside repair shops and burning incense sticks used as a supplemental aerosol source). For particles smaller than 1 μm, the in-cabin concentrations can be explained by the blower motor emissions. For particles larger than 1 μm, other aerosol sources, such as resuspended dirt, are present. Aerosol generated by the operation of the blower motor and by other sources can bias the exposure reduction measured by optical particle counters.

Keywords:

• aerosol generated
• bias
• cabin filtration
• carbon brushes

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was partially funded by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health through the Heartland Center for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH grant T42CCT717547).

The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.