Effects of Cross-Sectional Partitioning on Active Noise Control in Round Ducts

Abstract

Active noise control (ANC) is particularly useful in hard-walled ducts where plane waves propagate. Higher order mode waves are much more difficult to control. Basic acoustic principles dictate that the cut-on frequency at which higher order modes will first begin to eclipse simple plane waves in a duct will be determined by the cross-sectional diameter of the duct. The lowest frequency for higher order modes will increase as duct diameter decreases. Therefore, the range of frequencies where plane waves dominate will be greater, and effective control using ANC will be better as duct diameter decreases. The result is that somewhat higher frequencies can be controlled with ANC for smaller diameters. If smaller diameters have broader frequency ranges that can be controlled with ANC, perhaps one could extend the frequency range for a large cross section by partitioning it into smaller cross sections using axial vane splitters. This hypothesis was tested by two methods of cross-sectional partitioning. Partitioning was achieved in one design by inserting a smaller duct inside a large duct. In a second design, a cross-shaped splitter was inserted inside the large duct. Summed ANC insertion loss (IL) at low frequencies (≤250 Hz) was at least 16 dB and at least 14 dB at middle frequencies (≥315 Hz). ANC IL results were 1.7 to 2 dB better for the large duct partitioned by a smaller inner duct than the large duct alone (p = 0.0146 for low frequency and p = 0.0333 for middle frequency). ANC insertion loss was 5.6 dB better for the large duct partitioned by a cross-shaped splitter at high frequencies than the large duct alone (p = 0.0003). However, the cross-shaped partition system was 5.8 dB less effective at low frequencies than the large duct ANC IL alone (p < 0.0001).

Keywords:

• active noise control
• axial vane splitters
• noise cancellation
• partitioning
• round ducts

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was performed with support from a NIOSH grant. The authors would like to express appreciation to those who facilitated the work, Dr. Yi Luo of the West Virginia University Department of Mining Engineering, and Lt. Col. Jon Thomas and Andy Wells of the Air Force Institute for Operational Health.

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. government.

Notes

^A No treatments different from outer duct alone.