144
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Departments

Analytical Performance Criteria

Field Evaluation of Diacetyl Sampling and Analytical Methods

, , , , &
Pages D111-D116 | Published online: 26 Sep 2008
 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the significant collaboration of Kelly Howard and Dan Leiner for this work. Data collection support from James Couch, Brian Curwin, Chad Dowell, Kevin L Dunn, Alan Echt, Alberto Garcia, and Denise Giglio is appreciated as is the field guidance from Donald Booher, Karl Feldman, and Dan Farwick.

The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Mention of company names or products does not constitute endorsement by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Notes

A During Surveys 1 and 2, acetoin samples were analyzed only by the NIOSH method.

A P-values were calculated according to Signed Rank test comparing median difference between method results.

A P-values were calculated according to Spearman correlation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 148.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.