Increased sensitivity of OSHA method analysis of diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione in air

ABSTRACT

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) operated in selected ion monitoring mode was used to enhance the sensitivity of OSHA Methods 1013/1016 for measuring diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione in air samples. The original methods use flame ionization detection which cannot achieve the required sensitivity to quantify samples at or below the NIOSH recommended exposure limits (REL: 5 ppb for diacetyl and 9.3 ppb for 2,3-pentanedione) when sampling for both diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione. OSHA Method 1012 was developed to measure diacetyl at lower levels but requires an electron capture detector, and a sample preparation time of 36 hours. Using GC/MS allows detection of these two alpha-diketones at lower levels than OSHA Method 1012 for diacetyl and OSHA Method 1016 for 2,3-pentanedione. Acetoin and 2,3-hexanedione may also be measured using this technique. Method quantification limits were 1.1 ppb for diacetyl (22% of the REL), 1.1 ppb for 2,3-pentanedione (12% of the REL), 1.1 ppb for 2,3-hexanedione, and 2.1 ppb for acetoin. Average extraction efficiencies above the limit of quantitation were 100% for diacetyl, 92% for 2,3-pentanedione, 89% for 2,3-hexanedione, and 87% for acetoin. Mass spectrometry with OSHA Methods 1013/1016 could be used by analytical laboratories to provide more sensitive and accurate measures of exposure to diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione.

KEYWORDS:

• 2,3-pentanedione
• diacetyl
• increased sensitivity
• mass spectrometry
• OSHA Methods 1013/1016

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Anand Ranpara and Dru Burns for their time and effort in the laboratory and also thank Stephen Jackson and M. Abbas Virji for their thorough review of this article.

Funding

This publication is sponsored by the Sampling and Laboratory Analysis Committee of the American Industrial Hygiene Association.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in these proceedings are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) or the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by NIOSH. In addition, citations to websites external to NIOSH do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their programs or products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these websites. This document is not a standard or regulation. It creates no new legal obligation and alters no existing obligations created by OSHA standards or the Occupational Safety and Health Act. It may contain recommendations that are advisory in nature, informational in content, and are intended to support the provisions of safe and healthful workplaces.