380
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Do the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommendations for working in the heat prevent excessive hyperthermia and body mass loss in unacclimatized males?

, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 596-602 | Published online: 28 Sep 2022
 

Abstract

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommendations for work in the heat suggest workers consume 237 mL of water every 15–20 min and allow for continuous work at heavy intensities in hot environments up to 34 °C and 30% relative humidity. The goal was to determine whether the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommendations prevented core temperature from exceeding 38.0 °C and greater than 2% body mass loss during heavy-intensity work in the heat. Eight males consumed 237 mL of water every 20 min during 2 hr of continuous heavy-intensity walking (6.4 kph, 1% grade) in a 34 °C/30% relative humidity environment, in accordance with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommendations. Projected core temperature and percent body mass loss were calculated for 4 and 8 hr of continuous work. Core temperature rose from baseline (36.8 ± 0.3 °C) to completion of 2 hr of work (38.1 ± 0.6 °C, p < 0.01), with two participants reaching the 38.0 °C threshold. Projected core temperatures remained elevated from baseline (p < 0.01), did not change from 2 to 4 hr (38.1 ± 0.7 °C, p > 0.99) and 4 to 8 hr (38.1 ± 0.8 °C, p > 0.99), respectively, and one participant exceeded 38.0 °C at 4 to 8 hr. There was no change in body mass loss over time (p > 0.99). During 2 hr of continuous heavy-intensity work in the heat, 75% of participants did not reach 38 °C core temperature and 88% did not reach 2% body mass loss when working to National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommendations.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Riana R. Pryor, upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by the Mark Diamond Research Fund at the University at Buffalo.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 148.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.