https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6950-4173
![Sample our Social Sciences journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110822/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Social-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
At the end of the nineteenth century, China presented the characteristics of a stationary economy, rich in resources but weakened by a traditional society and a lack of understanding of economic dynamics. The extraordinary fact was that until the eighteenth century, China was equal to, if not more advanced than, Europe in scientific, technological knowledge and manufacturing processes. Scholars in the second half of the twentieth century underlined that China’s traditional society failed to create endogenous factors that would have encouraged the rise of capitalism and drew attention to ineffective institutions and government policies. More recently, modern scholars have explained that “divergence” was caused by the lack of available commodities. The empire barely stayed ahead of a soaring population and could not cope with the higher demand for natural resources. This article proposes an overview of this debate and examines arguments that are still open to intellectual contribution.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 Dwight Perkins (ed.), China’s Modern Economy in Historical Perspective (Stanford University Press, 1975); Robert Dernberger, “The role of foreigner in China’s Economic Development, 1840–1949”, in China’s modern economy in historical perspective, Dwight Perkins (ed.) (Stanford University Press, 1975); Albert Feuerwerker, The Chinese Economy 1870–1949 (University of Michigan, 1980).
2 Chu S. and Liu K.C. Li Hung-chang and China’s Early Modernization (Armonk, NY: M.E.Sharpe, 1994); Wang X. and Li J., “Modernization and the Study of Modern Chinese History,” Chinese Studies in History, vol. 43, no. 1(2009): 46–60; Wang J., “Economic Structure, Markets, and the Origin of Capitalism,” Chinese Studies in History, vol. 47, no 2 (2013): 7–20.
3 Luo R. “Xiandaihua lilun yu lishi yanjiu” (Modernization theory and historical studies), Lishi yanjiu (Historical research) (1996): 8; Luo R., Xiandaihua xinlun (Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan, 2006), 9.
4 Franklin Mendels, “Proto-Industrialization: The First Phase of the Industrialization Process,” The Journal of Economic History, (March 1972) vol.32, no. 1: 241–61; Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt, Endogenous Growth Theory (Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 1998).
5 Wang X. and Li J. Modernization, 47.
6 Joseph Esherick, The Origins of the Boxer Uprising (University of California Press, 1988); Paul Cohen, History in Three Keys. The Boxers as Event, Experience and Myth (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997); Lanxin Xiang, The Origin of the Boxer War (London: Routledge, 2003).
7 Albert Feuerwerker, China’s Early Industrialization: Sheng Hsuan-huai (1844 -1916) and Mandarin Enterprise. (Harvard University, 1958).
8 Wang X. and Li J. Modernization, 48.
9 Kenneth Pomeranz, The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000); Kevin O’Rourke and Jeffrey Williamson, “The spread of and Resistance to Global Capitalism,” in The Cambridge History of Capitalism, Neal Larry and Jeffrey Williamson (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, vol. II, 1–21); Bin Wong, “China before Capitalism,”, in The Cambridge History of Capitalism, Neal Larry and Jeffrey Williamson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014) vol. I:125–164; Loren Brandt, Debin Ma and Thomas Rawski “From Divergence to Convergence: Reevaluating the History Behind China’s Economic Boom,” Journal of Economic Literature, 2014, vol. 52, no. 1: 45–123.
10 Kenneth Pomeranz, The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).
11 Kenneth Pomeranz, The Great Divergence, 31–68.
12 Ibid., 206
13 Ibid., 172.
14 Ibid., 265.
15 Wong R. Bin, “China before Capitalism,” The Cambridge History of Capitalism, 125–164.
16 Loren Brandt, Debin Ma and Thomas Rawski, “From Divergence to Convergence: Reevaluating the History Behind China’s Economic Boom,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 52, no. 1(2014): 45–123.
17 Mark Elvin, The Pattern of the Chinese Past (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1973).
18 Loren Brandt, Debin Ma, and Thomas Rawski, From Divergence to Convergence.
19 Dwight Perkins (ed.), China’s Modern Economy in Historical Perspective; Albert Feuerwerker, The Chinese Economy 1870-1949.
20 Chiang T.F. Chung-kuo wai-chiao shih tzuliao chi-yao (Selected materials for the history of China’s foreign relations), vol. 1 (1934).
21 Guofan Zeng, “Letters to Li Hung-chang concerning Tseng’s attitude toward foreigners,” (3 June 1862) and “Tseng’s view on treaty revisions” (1867), in Collection of Tseng writings, translated by Ssu-yü Teng and John King Fairbanks China’s response to the West. Collection of documents translated (Cambridge M.: Harvard University Press, 1979), 63 and 65–67.
22 Ibid.
23 Chu S.and Liu K.C. Li Hung-chang and China’s Early Modernization (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1994).
24 Zuo Z. “Plan for Foochow shipyard” (1866), translated by Ssu-yü Teng and J. K. Fairbanks in China’s response to the West. Collection of documents (Cambridge M.: Harvard University Press, 1979), 81–83.
25 Wei Y. “Plans for maritime defense” (1842) translated by Ssu-yü Teng and J. K. Fairbanks, 30–35
26 Chu S., Reformer in Modern China: Chang Chien, 1853–1926, (New York: Columbia University Press, 1965); Zhou J., Li Hung-Chang and Chinese Modernization (Hefei: Anhui People Press, 1989)
27 Thomas Kennedy, “Chang Chih-tung and the struggle for strategic industrialization: the establishment of the Hanyang arsenal, 1884–1895.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, vol. 30 (1973): 154–182; Daniel Bays, China Enters the Twentieth Century: Chang Chih-Tung and the Issues of a New Age, 1895–1909 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1978).
28 Albert Feuerwerker, China’s Early Industrialization; Wellington Chan, Merchants, Mandarins, and Modern Enterprise in Late Ch 'ing China. (Cambridge Mass. 1997)
29 Li Hongzhang, “Defence of building steamships,” translated by Teng and Fairbanks, 108–110.
30 Thomas Kennedy, Chang Chih-tung and the struggle for strategic industrialization, 161.
31 Chu S. Reformer in Modern China: Chang Chien, 1853–1926 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1965)
32 Chong K.R. “Cheng Kuan-ying (1841-1920): a source of Sun Yat-sen’s Nationalist Ideology?,” The Journal of Asian Studies (Feb. 1969), 28, 2
33 Huang P., Liang Ch’i-ch’ao and Modern Chinese Liberalism (Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1972)
34 Zheng G., Criticism of Kuan-tu shan-pan (Sheng-shih wei-yen) (1892), translated by S.Teng and J.K.Fairbanks, 113–115.
35 Liang Qichao, “The Renovation of the People” (1902), translated by S. Teng and J.K. Fairbanks, 220–223.
36 Li Hung-chang. Li Wen-chug kung ch’uan-chi (The complete works of Li Hung-chang) (Nanking: 1905)
37 Juan Fang-chi, Yang-wu yun-tung shih lun-wen huan (Selected articles on the history of the Western Affairs movement), (Peking:1985), 56–102
38 Chu and Liu, Li Hung-chang and China’s early modernization.
39 Albert Feuerwerker, China’s Early Industrialization, 28.
40 Li Hung-chang, Li Wen-chung-kung ch’iian-chi (The complete works of Li Hung-chang) (Shanghai: Tsungli Yamen Letters, 1921), 1:40.
41 Chi-Kong Lai, “Li Hung-chang and Modern Enterprise. The China Merchants' Company, 1872-1885,” Chinese Studies in History, vol 25, no. 1 (1991): 19–51
42 Carlson Ellsworth, The Kaiping Mines, 1877–1912 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, East Asian Research Center, 1971)
43 Yun L. “Revisiting Hanyeping Company (1889–1908): A case study of China’s early industrialisation and corporate history,” Business History vol. 52, no. 1 (February 2010): 62–73
44 Wellington Chan, Merchants, Mandarins, and Modern Enterprise in Late Ch 'ing China, 14.
45 Lee E.H.“China's Response to Foreign Investment in Her Mining Industry (1902-1911),” The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 28, no. 1: 55–76; Wellington Chan, Merchants, Mandarins, and Modern Enterprise in Late Ch 'ing China, 432.
46 Dwight Perkins (ed.) China’s modern economy in historical perspective (Stanford University Press, 1975), 13
47 Martin K. Whyte, 1996 “The Chinese Family and Economic Development: Obstacle or Engine?” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 45, no 1: 1–30
48 John Meskill, The Pattern of Chinese History: Cycles, Development, or Stagnation? (Boston: Heath, 1965).
49 Lai Chi-Kong “Li Hung-chang and Modern Enterprise. The China Merchants' Company, 1872-1885,” Chinese Studies in History, vol. 25, no. 1: 22
50 Kung C. Chung-kuo hsin kung-yeh fa-chiang-shi ta-kan (an outline history of the Chinese modern industrial development (Shanghai: 1933), 36–43.
51 Cheng M. Qianzhuang Shi (Shanghai: Shanghai Wenyi Chubanshe, 1997); Ji Zhaojin. A History of Modern Shanghai Banking (New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2003).
52 Chiang C. Plan for the Reform of the National Salt Administration (Shanghai: National Review Office, 1913).
53 Hans van der Ven, “The Maritime Customs Service and the Global Origins of Modernity in China,” in Breaking with the Past (Columbia University Press, 2014), 173.
54 Hans van der Ven, “Francis Aglen, bonds market, and the early Republic (1911-1928)” in Robert Bickers and Jonathan Howett (eds.) Britain and China, 1840-1970: Empire, Finance and War (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2016), 176.
55 Charles Frederick Remer, Foreign Investment in China (New York: Macmillan Company, 1933)
56 Ibid. 58.
57 Ibid. 62.
58 Orazio Coco, “German Imperialism in China: the leasehold of Kiaochow Bay (1897-1914),” The Chinese Historical Review, vol, 26, no. 2: 156–174. DOI:10.1080/1547402X.2020.1750231.
59 Lee E.H. China's Response to Foreign Investment in Her Mining Industry, 56.
60 John MacMurray, Treaties and agreements with and concerning China (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1929). Contracts dated 21 May 1898 and 21 June 1898.
61 Thomas Kennedy, “Chang Chih-tung and the struggle for strategic industrialization: the establishment of the Hanyang arsenal, 1884–1895,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies vol. 30 (1973): 154–82
62 Ding R. “Shanghai Capitalists Before the 1911 Revolution,” Chinese Studies in History, vol. 18, no. 3–4: (1985): 33–82.
63 Horace Kent Percy, Railway Enterprise in China (London: Edward Arnold, 1907), 10.
64 Elizabeth Köll, Railroads and the Transformation of China (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2019)
65 Horace Kent Percy, Railway Enterprise in China, 109.
66 Lee E.H. China quest for railway autonomy, 1904-1911, 62.
67 Hsu M.C. Railway Problems in China, 89.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Orazio Coco
Orazio Coco received PhD in History of Europe from Sapienza University of Rome. Orazio has lived in the Far East for over twenty years and has lectured at the City University of Hong Kong and the University of Hong Kong (European Studies). Currently, he is teaching at the Department of History, Hong Kong Baptist University. He has published essays and reviews in Italy and in international academic journals including The Journal of Modern Italian Studies, International History Review, Chinese Historical Review and Chinese Journal of Global Governance.
Correspondence to: [email protected]