503
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Language-Specificity in Monolingual and Bilingual Later Lexical Development

, , &
Pages 309-329 | Published online: 08 Sep 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Although children may productively use concrete nouns after limited exposure, complete mastery of adult-like patterns of noun usage can take up to 14 years. We evaluated whether a transition from universal to language-specific naming is part of the refinement in later lexical development, and we compared how this refinement plays out in monolingual versus bilingual children. We collected free naming data for pictures of nearly 200 household containers from 499 Belgian children, aged 5 to 14, and adults, raised with either (a) only French, (b) only Dutch, or (c) both French and Dutch. Both monolingual and bilingual 5-year olds produced largely shared naming patterns, and for both groups, naming patterns became more language-specific and also more consistent within-language over time. However, monolinguals and bilinguals diverged in some aspects of their developmental profiles. Monolinguals started to introduce language-specificities to their naming pattern beginning at age 8, but differentiation between languages did not emerge for bilinguals until age 12. Consensus on name choice increased across ages for both groups, but bilinguals showed more consensus at all ages, reflecting smaller vocabularies and less differentiation. Thus monolingual and bilingual children follow a similar trajectory from shared to language-specific patterns of word use, but bilinguals differentiate later and for only some words. This study demonstrates that a transition from shared to language-specific naming is a key aspect of later lexical development, but the developmental course differs in detail between monolingual and bilingual children.

Acknowledgments

AW gathered and analyzed the data presented in this paper. All four authors discussed the findings thoroughly, participated in the writing of the manuscript, and approved the final version. We thank Julie Biesmans, Klara Delcourt, Karlien Finck, Emilie Loos, Kim Molders, and Jeremy Van Den Bossche for their help in gathering the children’s data, and their schools for permitting access.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Notes

1 The reliability estimate reported here is based on the average of 10,000 random splits of the data.

Additional information

Funding

AW was funded by Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO) and by KU Leuven (PDM 18/084). SV was funded by KU Leuven Research Council grant C14/16032 awarded to GS.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 239.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.