Navigating identity: Experiences of binary and non-binary transgender and gender non-conforming (TGNC) adults

ABSTRACT

Background: Emerging research and colloquial dialogues increasingly point to an uptick in non-binary gender identity endorsement, however research has failed to parallel this increase. For example, existing literature often conflates gender identity with sexual orientation, lumping TGNC people under the LGBTQ umbrella, thus rendering the “T” silent in the process. Further, extant research adheres to a binary (i.e., dichotomous male/female) conceptualization of gender, thus excluding individuals who identify as genderqueer, gender non-conforming, or otherwise non-binary as well as those who do not identify with the construct of gender at all (e.g., agender).

Method: This qualitative investigation utilized individual interviews with 15 TGNC adults. Data analysis employed two data-driven phases, first identifying themes consistent across the 15 transcripts to identify nuances in TGNC identity formation often missed by theory-driven models and second, establishing similarities and differences between binary and non-binary narratives.

Results: Results indicated that various helpful and challenging factors played a stronger role than chronology, physical transition, or activism across all participants which contrasts findings in extant literature. Further, while binary and non-binary narratives were similar in many regards, several noteworthy distinctions emerged. For example, the concepts of “passing or blending”, intersections of gender identity with sexual orientation, and navigating identity presentation and disclosure were described differently for binary and non-binary participants.

Conclusions: Historically, the “T” in “LGBTQ” has often been rendered silent. These results indicate that non-binary narratives have been rendered doubly silent. Given the increasing preponderance of non-binary identifications and the unique needs and experiences of non-binary participants, it is crucial that professional and lay communities alike begin to take two steps moving forward: 1) explicitly acknowledge the existence of non-binary TGNC identities and 2) work to achieve fluency regarding the unique needs and experiences of this population.

KEYWORDS:

• Gender non-conforming
• gender identity
• non-binary
• TGNC
• transgender

Declaration of conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Forensic Psychology Research Institute (FPRI) Grant, (N/A). Ohio Psychological Association Michael Sullivan Diversity Scholarship (N/A). This research was supported in part by grants from the Michael Sullivan Diversity Scholarship of the Ohio Psychological Association and the Forensic Psychology Research Institute (FPRI) Grant of John Jay College.