249
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Influence of different approaches to design-based learning on eighth grade students’ science content learning and STEM identity

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 300-325 | Received 25 Aug 2022, Accepted 05 Jun 2023, Published online: 28 Jun 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Design-based learning (DBL), a pedagogical approach to integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, has been internationally promoted in K-12 curricula. Despite DBL’s variations, research has indicated it can facilitate students’ content learning. However, it is less clear whether DBL can foster students’ STEM identity. The lack of research on this issue is critical, because STEM identity is a factor influencing secondary students to pursue STEM-related careers. This study aims to examine the influences of DBL on two types of learning outcomes achieved by eighth grade students. Two classes of 32 students, denoted Class 1 and Class 2, engaged in different approaches to DBL: respectively, design-through-science and science-through-design. Data were collected before and after DBL through using a conceptual test and a self-reported questionnaire measuring STEM identity. The data were descriptively and inferentially analysed to compare each class’s learning outcomes and the differences between these classes. Results reveal that, compared to Class 1, Class 2 more effectively improved their content learning and demonstrated more aspects of STEM identity. However, promoting content knowledge and developing STEM identity over a multi-week duration is challenging. It is necessary to integrate a specific framework into DBL to cultivate content learning and STEM identity.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Thailand Science Research and Innovation and the University of Phayao (Grant Number: FF65-RIM152). It was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles approved by the University of Phayao’s Human Ethics Committee (Code Number UP-HEC 2.1/043/64).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Luecha Ladachart

Luecha Ladachart is an Associate Professor of Science Education in School of Education at University of Phayao. His research focuses on STEM education through design-based approaches. He is now the director of master’s degree program of STEM education.

Visit Radchanet

Visit Radchanet is a physics teacher with senior professional level at the department of science and technology learning at Thumpinwittayakom School. He has engaged in research on STEM education using design-based approaches in secondary-school levels.

Wannakorn Phornprasert

Wannakorn Phornprasert is a lecturer of educational measurement and assessment at School of Education in University of Phayao. Developing and validating instruments for quantitative research is her area of expertise.

Wilawan Phothong

Wilawan Phothong is an Assistant Professor of Educational Technology in School of Education at University of Phayao. She is interested in computational thinking. She is now the director of master’s degree program of educational innovators.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 232.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.