220
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Decisions with Good Intentions: Substance Use Allegations and Child Protective Services Screening Decisions

Pages 293-316 | Received 21 Jul 2006, Accepted 27 Jan 2008, Published online: 12 Dec 2008
 

ABSTRACT

This quantitative study of decision-making factors related to screening maltreatment reports was conducted to investigate whether personal biases, values, and stereotypes surrounding parental drug use and race influenced screening decisions. In one southeastern state, 86 child welfare intake supervisors reviewed 10 scenarios alleging maltreatment. Participants decided which reports to accept for investigation, identified influential decision-making factors, and rated personal and organizational values surrounding parental drug use on a scale developed by the researcher. Participants' decision-making patterns suggest that when their values and child welfare policies conflicted in their desire to protect children, supervisors were willing to compromise policy standards for initiating investigations. The social justice implications of these findings are important for child welfare workers and administrators to consider.

Notes

Acknowledgements: This study was supported by the Guilford County Department of Social Services. I would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of the administration, the Child Protective Services supervisors, and the intake unit. For their mentoring and constructive feedback, I am indebted to Robert Wineburg and Kenneth Gruber, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, and to Marilyn Biggerstaff, Pat Dattalo, Ann Nichols-Casebolt, and, particularly, Humberto Fabelo, Virginia Commonwealth University. Appreciation is also expressed to the anonymous reviewers for their insights and feedback. This article developed from a presentation made at the annual conference of the Society for Social Work Research, January 14, 2005.

∗p = .003.

t (84) = 2.04, p = .04.

t (81) = 8.11, p < .001.

t (84) = −.30, p = .76;

∗∗t (84) = 1.46, p = .15.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 158.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.