Toxicity of acute exploratory amphetamine-salt medication in amphetamine-naïve pediatrics: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Pediatric ingestions of amphetamines used in the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are on the rise. Little data provide an amphetamine dose at which to refer pediatric unintentional ingestions to a healthcare facility for monitoring. We studied the dose at which unintentional ingestions of amphetamines develop symptoms and receive benzodiazepines.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study from a single poison center from 1/1/2005 through 11/30/2018. We included single substance ingestion of amphetamine salts to treat ADHD in amphetamine-naïve children age 0–12 years followed to a known outcome. Poison center documentation was reviewed for signs and symptoms related to amphetamine toxicity and use of benzodiazepines.

Results: We screened 1,394 cases and 160 met inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 1.8 years and 55% were male. The median dose of symptomatic patients (1.38 mg/kg) was greater than those without symptoms (0.83 mg/kg). The median amphetamine dose of patients receiving benzodiazepines (1.58 mg/kg) was also greater than for patients not receiving benzodiazepines (1.0 mg/kg). A dose threshold of greater than 0.75 mg/kg was 100% sensitive and 36.8% specific for benzodiazepine administration and 93.9% sensitive and 47.4% specific for presence of any symptoms.

Conclusions: The median dose of amphetamines ingested by patients receiving benzodiazepines was greater than those not receiving benzodiazepines. No child with a dose of ≤0.75 mg/kg received benzodiazepines. Prospective studies should be performed to assess triage guidelines and referral doses.

Keywords:

• Amphetamine
• attentional deficit hyperactivity disorder
• unintentional poisoning
• poison center

Acknowledgements

This study was presented in abstract at the 2019 North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology, Nashville, TN.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.