Abstract
Introduction
In 2023, a group of experts proposed that a definition of major bleeding in pharmaceutically anticoagulated patients be used in all snakebite trials. This includes bleeding that results in death, is life-threatening, causes chronic sequelae, or consumes major healthcare resources, including bleeding into a major area or hemoglobin concentration decrease ≥20 g/L. We hypothesized that a decline in hemoglobin concentration ≥20 g/L is common but rarely clinically significant in our population of Arizona rattlesnake bite patients.
Methods
Poison center records of rattlesnake bites in humans from 2018 through 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and assessed for major bleeding by the above criteria.
Results
Four hundred and eighty-one patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 265 (55.1%) had a hemoglobin concentration decrease ≥20 g/L. No patients died, and there was no evidence of bleeding into a critical organ. Three patients (1.1%) received blood transfusions. A decrease in hemoglobin concentration ≥20 g/L was 100% sensitive for identifying the major bleeding-associated outcomes; however, specificity was only 45.2%. Measures of healthcare utilization and chronic sequelae were somewhat higher in patients with a decrease in hemoglobin concentration ≥20 g/L.
Discussion
Laboratory manifestations of hemotoxicity were common in this population, but hemorrhage was rare. While over half of patients met the major bleeding criterion of a decline in hemoglobin concentration ≥20 g/L, only 1.1% had bleeding that was potentially life-threatening as measured by receipt of a red blood cell transfusion. None died or had bleeding into a critical area. While nonspecific for major bleeding, a drop in hemoglobin concentration correlated with worse envenomation severity: these patients received more vials of antivenom, had a higher medical bill, a longer hospital stay, and were less likely to report full recovery at 90 days.
Conclusions
A decrease in hemoglobin concentration ≥20 g/L should not be used as evidence of major bleeding for Arizona rattlesnake envenomation studies, but it may have a role as an indirect marker of envenomation severity.
Author contributions
GS, SW, and FW conceived and designed the study; GS, BW, JR, and FS helped acquire and analyze data; all authors helped interpret data, and drafted, revised and approved this submitted manuscript, and are accountable for this work.
Ethics statement
The Investigational Review Board at the University of Arizona approved this study.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, SW, upon reasonable request.