Explaining Bullying Victimization: Assessing the Generality of the Low Self-Control/Risky Lifestyle Model

ABSTRACT

The integrated low self-control/risky lifestyle theoretical framework has proven useful for explaining various types of victimization. Bullying victimization (i.e., verbal, social, or physical attacks), however, may not fit this explanation very well if youths who are bullied do not have to engage in risky behaviors to be singled out by their peers, but could instead be targeted for other reasons (e.g., physical vulnerabilities). In this context, the current paper examines the generality of the low self-control/risky lifestyle model by assessing whether it can effectively explain which youngsters are more likely to be bullied. Using a sample of 1,901 middle school students, the results indicate that, although low self-control significantly predicts whether youths will engage in risky lifestyles (e.g., displaying aggressive attitudes, committing delinquent acts, using illicit substances), participating in such behaviors does not elevate the likelihood of bullying victimization. Instead, the authors’ findings reveal that low self-control directly influences victimization. Further, physical vulnerability is significantly related to being bullied. These findings suggest that the low self-control/risky lifestyle model needs to be revised to accommodate potential age-graded consequences of self-control, and that physical limitations—not “traditional” risky lifestyles—are persistent sources of bullying victimization that should be further evaluated.

KEYWORDS:

• bullying
• lifestyle/routine activity theory
• schools
• self-control
• victimization

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Bureau of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (1999-SB-WX-0056). Points of view in the manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Bureau of Justice.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Bureau of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (1999-SB-WX-0056). Points of view in the manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Bureau of Justice.