ABSTRACT
In order to increase module efficiency in photovoltaic systems, research on passive fin cooling or active fluid cooling applications continues. It was thought that a collective cooling, which is a combination of both applications, could be more effective on the increasing electrical efficiency and so the increase of the total efficiency of the PV/T system by increasing the thermal gain. In this study, the effects of the amounts of nanoparticles on the electrical and thermal performance of the Al2O3 nanofluid in a newly designed, manufactured system which is named collective cooling system with internal direct fins were investigated in detail. Nanofluid coolants were prepared with the use of Al2O3 nanoparticles at a mass ratio of 0.2%, 0.4% and 0.6% and they were used in the system at constant mass flow rates. The highest panel temperature drop was observed as 17.3 °C and corresponding power increase rate was observed as 6.11% in the panel with 0.4% Al2O3-water nanofluid at 12:00. The averages of daily power increase rates for 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6% of Al2O3-water nanofluid cooling compared to the uncooled panel were 3.862%, 3.286%, 3.238% and 2.693% for the water-cooled panel, respectively. Compared to the water-cooled panel, the Al2O3-water nanofluid panel has average thermal efficiency increases of 39.77%, 28.92% and 15.92%, respectively, for 0.2%, 0.4%, and 0.6%.
Nomenclature
Al2O3 | = | Aluminum OxidePElectrical Power |
Ac | = | Fin Cross Section AreaPaPower Increase |
Aps | = | The Entire Heat Transfer Surface AreaPcPower of Cooled Panel |
Ap | = | Ratio of the Cross-Sectional Area |
Cc | = | Current of Cooled Panel |
Cn | = | Current of Normal PanelPElectrical Power |
Ç | = | Circumference of the ChannelPLPower of the Plate-Finned Panel |
Çk | = | Fin CircumferencePnPower of Normal Panel |
E | = | Channel WidthTfFilm Temperature |
Isc | = | Short-Circuit CurrentTAAmbient Temperature |
H | = | Convectional Heat CoefficientTgTemperature of Inlet Liquid |
Lt | = | The Thermal Development LengthTcupTemperature of Upper Point of Cooled Panel Surface |
Lk | = | Channel Length (M),TcmidTemperature of Mid Point of Cooled Panel Surface |
H | = | Channel HeightTcdownTemperature of Down Point of Cooled Panel Surface |
Ṁ | = | Mass Flow Rate of CoolantTçTemperature of Outlet Liquid |
N | = | Number of FinsTupTemperature of Upper Point of Panel Surface |
Ƞc | = | The Efficiency Cooled PanelTmidTemperature of Mid Point of Panel Surface |
Ƞa | = | Electrical Efficiency IncreaseTdownTemperature of Down Point of Panel Surface |
= | el | |
= | :Dynamic ViscositySTCStandard Test Conditions | |
= | Al2O3 Nanofluid | |
= | id | |
Pa | = | Power Increase |
Pc | = | Power of Cooled PanelVocOpen-Circuit Voltage |
= | elVnVoltage of Normal Panel | |
= | cyVcVoltage of Cooled Panel |
Acknowledgements
Data in this research was the results of the PhD thesis project by Batman University Institute of Science with Thesis Number of 637470. The research was performed at the Engine Research Laboratory, University of Batman, Batman, Turkey.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).