272
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A chance constraint microgrid energy management with phase balancing using electric vehicle demand aggregation

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 111-139 | Received 23 Sep 2022, Accepted 15 Dec 2022, Published online: 12 Jan 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Microgrids are sustainable distribution systems which integrate plug-in electric vehicles (EVs) and renewable energy sources to minimize grid dependency. The uncertainty in the forecast data of renewables and erratic consumption of energy by consumers aggravates voltage stability in a three-phase microgrid. Voltage instability and ineluctable uncertainty in the system inevitably make energy management of resources infeasible. To address the challenges of voltage stability and uncertainty in microgrid energy management, a novel two-stage energy management framework using stochastic chance constraint model predictive control (MPC) is proposed to optimize operational costs with reduced reserve costs. In the primary stage, an optimal day-ahead resource dispatching strategy is modeled using robust chance-constrained to handle the uncertainty of the forecasted data. Wasserstein metric ambiguity set is developed against uncertainty risk operations for low conservativeness and tractable constraints. The secondary stage control, with a shorter timescale, regulates the deviations in the primary stage state parameters using the MPC technique. Also, a fuzzy rule-based unbalance voltage control for EV parking lots (EVPL) is proposed in the secondary stage by modifying each phase’s power using phase switches. The proposed energy management framework adopts a mixed-stage optimization structure, where the concerned problem is progressively optimized over diverse time scales. The results of the proposed strategy show that lowering the confidence interval and increasing sampled data reduces operating costs by 7.57% and 5.34%, while penalty costs are reduced by 51.9% and 74.9%, respectively. It is also observed that this strategy minimizes the voltage unbalance on a modified IEEE 123 bus system and validates with benchmark approaches.

Nomenclature

Acronyms:=

 

ALD=

Aggregated load demand

BESS=

Battery Energy Storage System

CVaR=

Conditional value-at-risk

DE=

Diesel generator

DG=

Distributed generator

EMS=

Energy management systems

EV=

Electric vehicle

EVPL=

EV parking lots

HSS=

Hydrogen storage systems

MGCC=

Microgrid control center

MILP=

Mixed integer linear programming

MLD=

Mixed Logical Dynamical

MPC=

Model predictive control

MT=

Microturbines

PBR=

Power balance ratio

PV=

Photovoltaic panels

SOC=

State of charge

UPR=

Unbalanced power ratio

VU=

Voltage unbalance

VUF=

Voltage unbalance factor

WT=

Wind turbines

Indices/Sets:=

 

t=

Time period

N=

Control horizon

Ndg=

Number of DG

Nfdg=

Number of fuel DG

NEV=

Number of EVs

NEVCS=

Number of vehicles at charging station

Nbus=

Total buses in system

M=

Sampled data

P=

Probability distribution

E=

Expected value

I=

Identity matrix

Parameters:=

 

vw=

Wind velocity (m/s)

TA=

Ambient Temperature, (25°C)

IR=

Irradiance of the PV, (W/m2)

Pt=

Power at “t,”(kW)

δ=

Logical operator (ON/OFF)

η=

Efficiency (%)

Vhydride=

Metal Hydride Capacity (Nm)

Cbat=

Battery Capacity (kWh)

PL,PG=

Active power of loads and generators

QL,QG=

Reactive power of loads and generators

θ=

Angle of the voltage

V=

Voltage at a node

φprice=

Emission penalty cost

J=

Jacobian matrix

Y=

Admittance matrix

Iip=

Current of the phase “p” at ith node

V+,V,Vo=

Positive, negative and zero voltage sequence values

ai,bi,ci=

Cost of coefficients of DGs

cp=

Penalty price ($)

Iip=

Current in phase p at ith node

Sip=

Apparent power in phase p at with node (KVA)

Copt=

Operating cost ($)

Cop_et=

Emission cost ($)

Cop_ft=

Fuel cost ($)

Cop_gt=

Grid cost ($)

Eet=

Emissions at “t” (kg)

B=

Ambiguity set

Variables:=

 

PREt=

Renewables power at t, (kW)

PREςt=

Renewable Forecast Error (kW)

Pdgt=

DG power at “t,” (kW)

PBESSt=

Battery Energy Storage Power (kWh)

PBTt=

Battery power output at t, (kW)

PHSSt=

Hydrogen Storage System (kWh)

PH2t=

Power from hydrogen (kW)

PElzt=

Power to Electrolyzer (kW)

PEVCSt=

Power across the EV charging station (kW)

PEVt=

Electric vehicle power (kW)

Icharge=

Charge consumed (A)

Pμgridt=

Power of the microgrid (kW)

Epricet=

Electricity price (¢)

PL,pht=

Load Power (kW)

PEVPL,pht=

Phase power of EV parking lot (kW)

Plosst=

Power loss at each phase(kW)

μphk=

Unbalance factor

Cpt=

Penalty cost at t ($)

Data availability statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available online openly, and any further information required is available from the corresponding author upon request https://open-power-system-data.org/.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.