363
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Environmental Implications of Renewable Distributed Generation Technologies in Rural Electrification

, &
Pages 186-195 | Published online: 21 Mar 2008
 

Abstract

Customer choices and competition have led the electric utilities to undergo major regulatory and technological changes while power sector reform continues. A part of this change also originates from the rapid emergence of viable small-scale distributed generation (DG) sources that are highly competitive with grid-delivered electricity in the isolated areas. In this article, the cost-effectiveness of renewable DG sources (i.e., photovoltaics, small-scale wind turbines, and biomass gasifiers) are assessed and compared with centralized generation for the case of a rural and isolated island in the western state of India using the Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewables (HOMER), developed and provided by the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The model identifies a least cost set of various DG and centralized grid capacities and ranks them based on a life cycle cost. The adoption of DG technologies (especially wind and biomass gasifiers) provide no-regret options with significant CO2 emission mitigation potential when operated under net-metering scheme.

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the North Dakota Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research and the National Science Foundation for support to Dr. Michael Mann under Grant #0093923. However, only we are responsible for the views expressed in this paper. The authors go beyond the Hansen and Bower study; however, the analysis in this paper was possible with the majority of primary data published in the Hansen and Bower study.

Notes

1The levelized cost of energy (COE) is the average cost of producing electricity.

2For a gasifier engine operated on 100% producer gas.

3The Weibull shape factor is a measure of the distribution of wind speeds over the year.

4The clearness index, which is a fraction of the solar radiation transmitted through the atmosphere to reach the earth's surface, is a measure of the clearness of the atmosphere and generally varies from 0 to 1. The clearness index has a high value under clear, sunny conditions and a low value under cloudy conditions (NREL, 2005).

5The marginal abatement cost of CO2 (MACC) is calculated as follows:

where TC 0 is the present value of total cost corresponding to the BAU case, TC d is the present value of total cost corresponding to the distributed generation case, E t 0 is the CO2 emissions in year t corresponding to the BAU case, E t d is CO2 emissions in year t corresponding to the distributed generation case, r is the discount rate, and T is the life of the project.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.