ABSTRACT
With the introduction of school choice as a viable option of school reform, researchers have begun to look beyond academic achievement to the effects of choice on alternative outcomes. Recently, non-cognitive skills and behavior stand at the front of those alternative outcomes. From the most up to date relevant literature it appears that school choice has adverse effects on non-cognitive skills but positive effects on behavior. The potential presence of reference group bias highlights the possibility that the negative effects of choice on non-cognitive skills may not be real.
Notes
1. The DID analysis measures the difference between the average outcomes for the treatment and control groups assuming they have the same trends in the absence of the intervention.
2. The ITT estimates report the effects of winning the charter lottery compared to not winning the lottery.
3. The TOT estimates report the effects of attending a charter school compared to attending another school.
4. The FE analysis works to remove selection and omitted variable bias by measuring change within an individual by using the individuals past as the counterfactual.
5. The 2SLS analysis uses the prediction of charter attendance based on being offered admission to estimate an unbiased effect of charter attendance on various outcomes.
6. The IOT analysis uses lottery results as an instrument of charter attendance to estimate the impact of charter attendance on various outcomes.
7. The LATE effects measure the average effect of attending HCZ by way of winning the lottery.