Publication Cover
International Journal of Architectural Heritage
Conservation, Analysis, and Restoration
Volume 17, 2023 - Issue 6
153
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Lateral Resistance of Brick Masonry Walls: A Rational Application of Different Strength Criteria Based on In-plane Test Results

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 846-867 | Received 12 Apr 2021, Accepted 07 Oct 2021, Published online: 14 Nov 2021
 

ABSTRACT

In the assessment and design of masonry buildings, several strength criteria can be applicable according to the prevailing mechanism, since masonry walls subjected to horizontal cyclic excitations, such as seismic actions, can be characterized by flexural/rocking modes, shear and sliding failures or by a combination of them. Several studies and correlations between different existing formulations have been performed in the past and are already available in the literature, but a lack of unanimous consensus still remains on the more rational criteria for the evaluation of the lateral strength of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls. This topic becomes even more relevant after the recent release of new structural codes, which propose, for existing buildings, different alternative formulations for the calculation of the in-plane shear strength of URM piers, making the choice of the more suitable approach to adopt rather intricate, above all when dealing with brick masonry. The aim of this study is to clarify the application of the different strength expressions specifically for the case of brick masonry walls. In order to achieve that, a systematic comparison between the results obtained from the application of different expressions with the experimental data coming from in-plane cyclic tests of brick masonry walls has been performed. This study has allowed to identify a more rational application of the various strength formulations in the case of brick walls, providing a basis for the improvement of the codified approaches and an useful tool for professionals.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Aknowledgements

This research has been carried out at the University of Pavia and EUCENTRE and it has been partially funded by the Executive Project DPC-RELUIS 2019-2021. The financial support received is gratefully acknowledged.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 174.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.