284
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison of Estimators of the Weibull Distribution

&
Pages 238-259 | Received 22 Aug 2012, Accepted 22 Aug 2013, Published online: 24 Mar 2014
 

Abstract

We compare the small sample performance (in terms of bias and root mean squared error) of the L-moment estimator of a three-parameter Weibull distribution with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), moment estimation (MoE), least-square estimation (LSE), the modified MLE (MMLE), the modified MoE (MMoE), and the maximum product of spacing (MPS). Overall, the LM method has a tendency to perform well as it is almost always close to the best method of estimation. The ML performance is remarkable even at a small sample size of when the shape parameter lies in the [1.5, 4] range. The MPS estimator dominates others when . For large , MMLE outweighs others in samples of size , whereas LM is preferred in samples of size .

Keywords

Acknowledgment

We thank the anonymous referees for their helpful, and constructive comments and suggestions on an earlier draft of the article. We are highly indebted to Jonathan R. M. Hosking (Statistical Analysis and Forecasting, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, USA) for e-mail correspondence and his helpful insights on issues related with the L-moment estimation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.