1,013
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An empirical analysis of barriers to building information modelling (BIM) implementation in construction projects: evidence from the Chinese context

, , , &
Pages 3119-3127 | Published online: 09 Nov 2020
 

Abstract

Although building information modelling (BIM) applies widely in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry, its systematic implementation in AEC projects still experiences challenges. While most previous studies have investigated general BIM implementation, the present study precisely focuses on the barriers to BIM implementation at the AEC project level and explores their sources in the Chinese project context. Based on a questionnaire survey with 166 valid responses from experienced BIM practitioners as empirical evidence from the Chinese construction context, the data were processed using descriptive statistical analysis, non-parametric analysis and principal component analysis. The results of the descriptive analysis classified 14 critical barriers. The international comparison of the top five barriers indicated that the most critical barriers were similar but ranked differently in different countries. The following principal component analysis revealed six underlying factors for all the barriers, which were experience and capabilities, technical conditions, system inertia, extra input, change of work routines, and implementation risks. The findings of this study may help the practitioners to understand BIM implementation barriers, allocate resources, and prioritize efforts in project practices. This study can also provide implications for BIM deployment and governance in the AEC industry.

Data availability statement

Data of this study can be accessed from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank The Hong Kong Jockey Club and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for funding this research. The authors wish to thank Prof. HUANG Qiang and Prof. CHENG Zhijun from China BIM Union for supporting the data collection in the survey. The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Disclosure statement

There is no potential conflict of interest reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 158.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.