44
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Foraging behaviour in East Asian desert rodents and its implications on coexistence

, , , &
Pages 171-177 | Received 20 Jan 2015, Accepted 17 Apr 2015, Published online: 03 Aug 2016
 

Abstract

We studied the foraging behaviour of two sympatric rodents (Meriones meridianus and Dipus sagitta) in the Gobi Desert, Northwestern China. The role of the foraging behaviour in promoting species coexistence was also examined. We used giving-up densities (GUDs) in artificial food patches to measure the patch use of rodents and video trapping to directly record the foraging behaviour, vigilance, and interspecific interactions. Three potential mechanisms of coexistence were evaluated (1) microhabitat partitioning; (2) spatial heterogeneity of resource abundance with a tradeoff in foraging efficiency vs. locomotion; and (3) temporal partitioning on a daily scale. Compared to M. meridianus, D. sagitta generally possessed lower GUDs, spent more time on patches, and conducted more visits per tray per capita, regardless of microhabitat. However, M. meridianus possessed advantages in average harvesting rates and direct interference against D. sagitta. Our results only partly support the third mechanism listed above. We propose another potential mechanism of coexistence: a tradeoff between interference competition and safety, with M. meridianus better at interference competition and D. sagitta better at avoiding predation risk. This mechanism is uncommon in previously studied desert rodent systems.

Acknowledgements

Ethics approval was given by Animal Ethics Committees at Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. We thank Guang-Long Yang and Shi-Jie Yuan for their generous help in our field work. Special thanks are given to Prof. Douglas Morris for his very insightful comments on our manuscript. We also thank the Gaotai Forestry Bureau for land use permission.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15659801.2015.1045279.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 31201722].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.