Publication Cover
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance
Volume 15, 2019 - Issue 5
565
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measurement-based support for post-earthquake assessment of buildings

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 647-662 | Received 21 Mar 2018, Accepted 11 Oct 2018, Published online: 10 Feb 2019
 

Abstract

After a damaging earthquake, assessment of the residual seismic capacity is required for large parts of the building stock. Increased vulnerability of structures together with the threat of immediate aftershocks call for rapid and objective decision making. Structural identification has the potential to reduce parameter-value uncertainties of physics-based models through interpreting measurement data. Significant amounts of uncertainty are associated with the non-linear behaviour of structures during extreme events such as earthquakes. Therefore, a structural identification methodology that accommodates multiple sources of systematic modelling uncertainties is used. Error-domain model falsification (EDMF) enables structural identification through combining damage grades observed by visual inspection with fundamental frequencies that are derived from ambient vibrations. Parametric uncertainties of a hysteretic model are reduced with the two information sources in order to extrapolate the vulnerability of the building regarding future earthquakes. The applicability of the methodology is shown using measurements made on a mixed reinforced-concrete unreinforced-masonry building tested on a shaking table. Based on nonlinear time-history analyses involving single-degree-of-freedom models, EDMF leads to more precise, yet robust, vulnerability predictions of earthquake-damaged buildings when compared with prediction ranges that are obtained without data interpretation.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge EESD (Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics Laboratory), EPFL for providing the test results, and K. Beyer for her remarks that helped to improve the quality of the work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation under Contract No. 200020-169026.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 298.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.