159
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A mixed-methods study of self-change among severely substance-dependent Israelis: does gender make a difference?

, &
Pages 36-46 | Received 17 Jun 2019, Accepted 29 Jan 2020, Published online: 23 Feb 2020
 

Abstract

A mixed-methods design was used to examine gender differences in self-change (SC), and integrate the quantitative findings with information extracted from qualitative narratives. The sample included 133 self-changers (52 women and 81 men), with a subsample of 25 respondents. The quantitative analysis showed no significant gender differences in personal characteristics, except in history of child abuse. Women reported a higher rate of emotional and sexual abuse than men. In comparison, the qualitative findings showed gender differences in constructing the SC process, which was based on gender stereotypes. Respondents simultaneously expressed two types of attitudes: egalitarian attitudes toward gender equality, and traditional attitudes toward gender roles and traits. In conclusion, the findings suggest that SC can occur among severely substance-dependent women and men. Both genders attributed their successful SC to the ability to regulate their emotions, and their explanations were rooted in gender stereotypes.

Ethical declarations

The authors ensured informed consent by distributing a written statement to respondents that provided the names and phone numbers of the research team members, the purpose of the research, the names of the funding body, how the data would be stored, information about confidentiality and anonymity, and information on local sources of immediate support regarding substance use and related problems. The information collected by means of questionnaires and interviews was treated as confidential and was only available to the research team. The authors ensured that no harm came to the respondents as a result of speaking to us, by providing information on sources of local help for substance use and related problems and by protecting their anonymity and referring to them only by a randomized reference number. This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Bar-Ilan University.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Israel Anti-Drug Authority (IADA) [grant number 204152].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 416.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.