505
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Do perceptions and experiences of vaping among youth and young adults differ by device type?

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 51-56 | Received 03 Sep 2020, Accepted 24 Mar 2021, Published online: 20 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

Youth and young adult (YYA) vaping is an escalating public health concern. Due to their sleek designs, desirable flavors, and high nicotine concentrations, pod-based devices currently hold the largest e-cigarette market share. The major contribution of pod-based devices to the vaping epidemic substantiates studying differences in perceptions and experiences between YYAs for pod and non-pod devices. Such evidence is imperative in hopes of developing device-specific interventions to decelerate e-cigarette use, which to date is limited. To address aforementioned gaps, nicotine-based e-cigarette users residing in Canada [N = 403, 53.6% male, mean age = 18.3 years (SD = 1.9), pod users = 62.5%] were surveyed using open-ended questions. Responses to each question were coded by topic. Using these codes, differences between YYA (youth versus young adults) use of each device type (pods and non-pod devices) were quantitatively examined for each topic and underlying categories. Youth non-pod users frequently reported nicotine rush and enhancement more frequently and positive social aspects less frequently than young adult non-pod users. Youth pod users reported more exposure to buying and selling vaping content on social media than young adult pod users. The novel findings of this study highlight the need for considering differences among YYA users of each device-type in developing policies and interventions. Policies in the form of reducing nicotine concentration and alternative coping strategy interventions will likely work for youth non-pod users, yet de-normalizing vaping through social marketing distinctively benefits young adult counterparts. Additionally, regulating social media in both user- and industry-generated forms is key for youth pod users.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Heart & Stroke for providing funding for this project.

Disclosure statement

All three authors have affiliations with the Lung Association of Nova Scotia. There may be a perceived conflict because of this affiliation.

Ethical approval

Ethics clearance was attained from the Saint Mary’s University Research Ethics Board (#19-105).

Data availability statement

Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data is not available.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Mohammed Al-Hamdani

Mohammed Al-Hamdani is a part-time faculty in Psychology at Saint Mary’s University and serves as the Director of Health Initiatives with the Lung Association of Nova Scotia.

D. Brett Hopkins

D. Brett Hopkins is an M.Sc. student at Dalhousie University and a Senior Research Assistant with the Lung Association of Nova Scotia.

Myles Davidson

Myles Davidson is a B.A. student at Saint Mary’s University and a Research Assistant with the Lung Association of Nova Scotia.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 416.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.