244
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Hierarchical and mediated relations between internalizing symptoms, alcohol and cannabis co-use, and AUD

Pages 213-219 | Received 20 Jul 2021, Accepted 26 Oct 2021, Published online: 13 Nov 2021
 

Abstract

Background

Alcohol and cannabis co-use is associated with negative alcohol consequences and alcohol use disorder. However, mediating and distal effects remain largely unstudied. Co-use is associated with alcohol use disorder/negative consequences even when accounting for drinking levels and personality, suggesting that other person-level characteristics may explain relations between co-use and negative outcomes.

Method

The current study tested whether internalizing symptoms, strong correlates of co-use and alcohol use disorder, explained the effect of co-use on alcohol use disorder. Data from adults (N = 353,000) in the 2008–2019 National Study on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) were used. Analyses tested whether (1) substance use profiles reduced/dissipated the effect of co-use on alcohol use disorder, (2) internalizing symptoms (anxiety, depression) reduced/dissipated the effect of co-use on alcohol use disorder, and (3) internalizing symptoms were indirectly associated with alcohol use disorder via co-use.

Results

When accounting for frequency/quantity of use, co-use was still associated with higher odds of alcohol use disorder. Anxiety and depression were related to higher odds of an alcohol use disorder, however, the effect of co-use on higher odds of alcohol use disorder remained. Anxiety and depression scores were indirectly associated with higher odds of alcohol use disorder via co-use.

Conclusions

Depressive and anxiety symptoms only accounted for a portion of the variance of co-use on alcohol use disorder, and there were indirect effects of internalizing symptoms through co-use. Future longitudinal research is needed to elucidate other person-level characteristics that drive associations between co-use and alcohol use disorder to target via interventions.

Ethics statement

All participants provided informed consent to the NSDUH methodology team, and all data were deidentified and made publicly available. The current study was exempt from the local institution’s IRB.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1 Estimation of missing data via FIML required Monte Carlo Integration, since the models accounted for complex survey design of the NSDUH (variance adjustments and sample weighting). However, models were unchanged when run using listwise deletion.

2 Standardized coefficients are not available for models with a categorical mediator, and thus (1) indirect effects are reported as unstandardized coefficients and odds ratios, and (2) R2 estimates for co-use were not available.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 416.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.