146
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Which substances pose the greatest risk of substance use disorder after controlling for polysubstance use?

, &
Received 20 Jul 2023, Accepted 28 Nov 2023, Published online: 16 Dec 2023
 

Abstract

Both physiological and epidemiological research suggest that certain psychoactive substances have a greater potential for abuse (e.g. heroin) than others (e.g. hallucinogens). The use of multiple substances is also associated with a higher risk of substance use disorder (SUD). The goal of the present study was to evaluate the association between the use of different substances and the risk of SUD while accounting for polysubstance use. Data from the 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (n = 58,034, unweighted) were used. Eight different substances (i.e. Alcohol, Cannabis, Cocaine, Inhalants, Hallucinogens, Heroin, Methamphetamine, and Opiate Misuse) were compared with respect to their typical frequency of use; the prevalence of SUD among individuals using each substance; the odds of SUDs when controlling for polysubstance use; and the rate of other substance use among those with a substance-specific SUD. Notable differences were found regarding the frequency of use and the rate of SUD among individuals reporting past year use. Heroin and methamphetamine were associated with the highest risk of SUD across all analyses. In contrast, hallucinogens and inhalants were consistently identified as having the lowest risk. The present results confirm that certain substances appear to have an inherently greater association with SUD compared to other substances. While these findings are not fundamentally divergent from prior epidemiological studies or ranking systems, they provide a more solid empirical foundation for assumptions of differential risk.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Severity levels were not included in the public use datafile for opiate misuse (Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality 2022).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 416.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.