1,778
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Europe

The circumplex model of affect in physical activity contexts: a systematic review

&
Pages 168-201 | Received 30 Apr 2020, Accepted 14 Oct 2020, Published online: 10 Dec 2020
 

ABSTRACT

For sustained physical activity participation, prescription should promote pleasure. Pleasure/displeasure from activities can be influenced by various factors and have meaningful relations with continuous practice adherence. Considering the importance of affective assessment in these settings, the aim of this review is to explore the usefulness and efficacy of the circumplex model to detect the fluctuations of affective responses across physical activity practices. This systematic review was conducted through a search on PubMed, SPORTDiscus and PsycINFO, adding studies retrieved manually and following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 25 empirical studies published between 1998 and March, 2020 were analysed. Studies on the application of the circumplex model were found in aerobic (n=14), resistance (5), and mixed activities (6). The circumplex model was applied in various settings without any major problem or issue identified. Most studies recorded pre-, during, and post-practice affective responses. Analysing the predominance of each of the four quadrants composing the model, most studies revealed a pattern of affective valence that mainly crossed the low-activation pleasure, high-activation pleasure and high-activation displeasure quadrants. Some discrepancies regarding measurement time points, methods, and individual vs. groups analysis emerged; no testing or associations with exercise adherence were detected. Results showed that the circumplex model seems to be a viable tool to assess affective valence and activation in physical activity. However, given the variety of practice settings, individual characteristics, and methodological inconsistencies, more research is needed to better define how and when to apply this instrument in a reliable manner.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Faculty of Physical Education and Sport (ULHT), Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 242.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.