234
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Europe

Emotional evaluations of pictures of female and male soccer players

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1383-1396 | Received 14 Jan 2021, Accepted 26 Jul 2021, Published online: 23 Sep 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Soccer is one of the sports activities, where stereotypes against women are still quite common. Also, participation is lower for women in a male-stereotyped sport. One possible explanation might be different attitudes toward female and male athletes in a male-stereotyped sport. It is the main goal of this study to investigate if male soccer players are rated more positively compared to female soccer players. 176 participants (100 cisgender women and 76 cisgender men) completed an explicit and implicit affective rating task and a self-compassion questionnaire. The results showed an own-gender bias in the explicit rating task. In the implicit affective rating task, female soccer players were evaluated more positively than male soccer players, independent of the own gender. Besides, self-compassion was related to the affective evaluations. Explicit and implicit affective ratings did not correlate. According to the implicit and explicit ratings found in this study, we suggest that it is unlikely that implicit affective evaluations are the underlying mechanism of stereotypes in soccer. However, we did not examine the relation of implicit evaluations to stereotypes in sports performance. Therefore, further studies should be conducted to investigate those effects, as well as the impact of other influencing variables on stereotypes against women and female participation in a gender-stereotyped sports activity.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the research team of the sports institute and to Ronja Rundberg for their advice and helpful discussions. Furthermore, we would like to thank our student research assistants Alexander Kalus and Samuel Pfanzelt for their help with the experimental setup and data preparation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Availability of data

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in OSF data repository at (https://osf.io/ejd32/).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 242.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.