100
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Evaluation of a hearing screener

, , &
Pages 115-119 | Published online: 11 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the compatibility of the hearing screener with pure tone audiometry and its capacity to predict the need and benefit of HAs. The device is a low-cost, easy to handle and safe instrument. It screens at 1 and 3 kHz at three different intensity levels. The outcome of the screen is categorized into six groups according to the number of tones heard and related to eventual fitting of HAs. One hundred and fifty persons (300 ears), with a median age of 65 years (range 20–86 years), consented to a hearing screen prior to pure tone audiometry, which was performed as part of the routine evaluation in the department. A comparative analysis of the pure tone audiometric thresholds and the screen thresholds showed that 27% of ears deviated >10 dB and 4%> 20dB at 1 kHz. At 3 kHz a deviation of >10dB was found in 34% and >20dB in 18%. The screen sensitivity was 92% related to persons and 89% related to ears, whereas the screen specificity was 65% and 62%, respectively. A PPV of 87% was indicated. The benefit of HAs was assured by the IOI-HA and SADL total scores of 3.9 and 4.0, respectively, with significant differences in the scores of the IOI-HA between the screened true and false positives. It is concluded that the screener has potential for use in developing countries and can be used as an alternative lean service delivery in developed countries.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.