1,100
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Folding on manifolds and their fundamental group

ORCID Icon
Pages 16-19 | Received 08 Jun 2018, Accepted 21 Aug 2018, Published online: 07 Sep 2018

ABSTRACT

In this paper, the induced sequence of folding and unfolding on the fundamental group will be obtained from a sequence of folding and unfolding on a manifold. The limit of folding and unfolding on the fundamental group is deduced. The sequences of the commutative diagram of fundamental groups will be achieved from the sequences of the commutative diagram of manifolds. The connection between a manifold and a fundamental group is assigned.

SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES:

1. Introduction and definitions

Classical results in algebraic topology give that groups are naturally realized as fundamental groups of spaces. For instance, free groups arise as fundamental groups of wedges of circles, any group can be realized as the fundamental group of some CW-complex, and pushouts of groups arise via the van Kampen theorem. This ability to construct geometric interpretations of discrete groups has important applications in both topology and algebra. The fundamental group was introduced by Poincare on a topological space that provides a way of determining when two paths, starting and ending at a fixed base point, can be continuously deformed into each other. Intuitively, it records information about the basic shape, or holes, of the topological space [Citation1]. Let X be a topological space and x0X, the set π1(X,x0)={homotopy classes of loops in (X,x0)}, together with the product operation [f][g]=[f.g] is called the fundamental group where π1 is a functor map between categories [Citation1]. The fundamental groups of some types of a manifold were studied in [Citation2–7]. An n-dimensional manifold is a Hausdorff space M such that each point in M has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to Rn [Citation8]. A submanifold of a manifold M is a subset N which itself has the structure of a manifold [Citation1,Citation8]. Let X be a topological space and let AX be a subspace. We say A is a retract of X if there exists a continuous map r:XA such that r(a)=a,aA [Citation8,Citation9]. Given spaces X and Y where x0X and y0Y, and XY=, then we define the wedge sum XY as the quotient of XY by identification x0y0 [Citation1]. Let M1 and M2 be two smooth manifolds of dimension m1 and m2 respectively. A map F:M1M2 is said to be an isometric folding of M1 into M2 if for every piecewise geodesic path Υ:IM1 the induced path FΥ:IM2 is piecewise geodesic and of the same length as Υ [Citation10]. If F does not preserve length it is called topological folding [Citation11]. A map φ:M1M2 is said to be unfolding of M1 into M2 if, for every piecewise geodesic path Υ:IM1, the induced path φΥ:IM2 is piecewise geodesic with a length greater than Υ [Citation12]. For more information about the folding on manifolds and topological spaces, see [Citation13–17].

2. The main result

Theorem 2.1:

Given a compact connected closed n-dimensional topological manifold M. Then, each folding F:MM induces F¯:π1(M)π1(M) such that F¯(π1(M))=π1(F(M).

Proof:

Let M be compact connected closed n-dimensional topological manifold, then, F¯(π1(M))=F¯{[α]:whereαisaloopbased atx0ϵM}={[F(α)]:whereF(α)isaloopbasedatF(x0)ϵF(M)}=π1(F(M)).  ▪

Theorem 2.2:

Let M be a compact connected closed 1-dimension topological manifold. Then there are only two different foldings F:MM, which induces F¯:π1(M)π1(M)such that rank F¯(π1(M))1.

Proof:

Let M be a compact closed manifold of dimension 1, then M is homeomorphic to S1. Now consider the folding F:MM, such that F(M)S1 which induces F¯:π1(M)π1(M) such that F¯(π1(M))=π1(F(M)) and so rank F¯(π1(M))=1. Also, if F:MM is a folding such that F(M)S1, then F(M) is a bounded one-dimensional submanifold of M that is homeomorphic to [a,b], thus we obtain the induced F¯:π1(M)π1(M), for which F¯(π1(M))=π1(F(M)) and rank F¯(π1(M))=0.

Theorem 2.3:

(i) Let B0 be a bounded one-dimensional submanifold of Rn, that is homeomorphic to (0,1), then there is a sequence of unfolding {φi:Bi1Bi:i=1,2,,m} with variation curvature which induces a sequence of unfoldings {φ¯i:π1(Bi1)π1(Bi):i=1,2,,m} such that limm(φ¯m(π1(Bm1))) is an infinite cyclic group.

(ii) Let M0=j=1n(S1Ti), n-tori touch the circle then, there is a sequence of folding by a cut {Fi:Mi1Mi:i=1,2,,m} which induces a sequence of foldings {F¯i:π1(Mi1)π1(Mi):i=1,2,,m} such that limm(F¯m(π1(Mm1))) is an infinite cyclic group.

Proof:

(i) Let B0 be a bounded one-dimensional submanifold of Rn that is homeomorphic to (0,1). Then, consider the following sequence of unfoldings with variation curvature: φ1:B0B1,φ2:B1B2,,φm:Bm1Bm for which limm(φm(Bm1))S1 as in , which induces φ¯1:π1(B0)π1(B1),φ¯2:π1(B1)π1(B2),,φ¯m:π1(Bm1)π1(Bm), for which limm(φ¯m(π1(Bm1)))=π1(limmφm(Bm1))=π1(S1). Hence, limm(φ¯m(π1(Bm1))) is an infinite cyclic group.

Figure 1. Limit folding on a bounded one-dimensional submanifold of Rn.

Figure 1. Limit folding on a bounded one-dimensional submanifold of Rn.

(ii) Let F1:M0M1,M0M1,F2:M1M2,M1M2,,Fm:Mm1Mm,Mm1Mm for which limm(Fm(Bm1))S1 as in , which induces F¯1:π1(M0)π1(M1),F¯2:π1(M1)π1(M2),,F¯m:π1(Mm1)π1(Mm) for which limm(F¯m(π1(Mm1)))=π1(limmFm(Mm1))=π1(S1) Hence, limm(F¯m(π1(Mm1))) is an infinite cyclic group.

Figure 2. Limit folding on n-tori touch the circle.

Figure 2. Limit folding on n-tori touch the circle.

Theorem 2.4:

Let M0=T1I. Then there is a sequence of unfolding for which limm(φ¯m(π1(Mm)))=ZF2, where F2 is a free abelian group of rank 2.

Proof:

Consider the following sequence of unfolding: φ1:M0M1,φ2:M1M2,,φm:Mm1Mm for which limm(φm(Mm1))=T1S1 as in , thus limm(φ¯m(π1(Mm)))=π1limmφm(Mm)=ZF2 where F2 is a free abelian group of rank 2.

Figure 3. Limit unfolding of T1I.

Figure 3. Limit unfolding of T1∨I.

Theorem 2.5:

Let A0={(r,θ),1r2}, then there is a sequence of unfoldings {Fi:Ai1Ai:i=1,2,,m} which induces a sequence of unfoldings {F¯i:π1(Ai1)π1(Ai):i=1,2,,m} such that limm(F¯m(π1(Am1))) is an infinite cyclic group.

Proof:

Let A={(r,θ),1r2},S1={(r,θ),r=1}. Also consider the following sequence of unfoldings: φ1:A0A1,φ2:A1A2,,φm:Am1Am, for which limm(φm(Am1))S1 as in , which induces φ¯1:π1(A0)π1(A1),φ¯2:π1(A1)π1(A2),,φ¯m:π1(Am1)π1(Am) such that limm(φ¯m(π1(Am1)))=π1(limmφm(Am1))=π1(S1). Hence, limm(φ¯m(π1(Am1))) is an infinite cyclic group.

Figure 4. Limit unfolding of A0.

Figure 4. Limit unfolding of A0.

Theorem 2.6:

Let X0 denote the field of real numbers. Then there is a sequence of unfoldings φi:Xi1Xi with variation curvature which induce foldings φ¯i:π1(Xi1)π1(Xi):i=1,2,,m, such that limm(φ¯m(π1(Xm1))) is a free group on a countable set of generators.

Proof:

Consider the following sequence of unfoldings with variation curvature: φ1:X0X1,φ2:X1X2,,φm:Xm1Xm such that limm(φm(Xm1))=1Ci1 as in , which induce a folding φ¯i:π1(Xi1)π1(Xi):i=1,2,,m, thus limm(φ¯m(π1(Xm1)))=π1(limmφm(Xm1))=i=1Z. Therefore, limm(φ¯m(π1(Xm1))) is a free group on a countable set of generators.

Figure 5. Limit unfolding of R.

Figure 5. Limit unfolding of R.

Theorem 2.7:

Let M=RS1×Z/ where given iR with ((0,1),i)S1×Z and Mk=k,kS1×k,S1,k/, kϵN, that is Mk the interval [k,k] with 2k+1 circles attached. Then kϵN, the folding Fk:MM induces F¯k:π1(M)π1(M) for which rank F¯k(π1(M))=k.

Proof:

Let Fk:MM be a folding map such that Fk(M)=Mk,, kϵN where Mk=k,kS1×k,S1,k/ as in , which induces F¯k:π1(M)π1(M) for which rank F¯k(π1(M))=k.

Figure 6. Folding on M.

Figure 6. Folding on M.

Theorem 2.8:

Suppose that M is a manifold of dimension one, N is a submanifold of M and let Fi, φi and ri,i=1,2,,n are sequences of folding, unfolding and retraction map respectively. Then there is a sequence of the commutative diagram of manifolds which induces a sequence of the commutative diagram of the fundamental groups.

Proof:

Consider the following sequences of the commutative diagram: MF1M1F2M2limmFmpoint (0- dimensional manifold)r1r2r3limmrmNφ1N1φ2N2limmφmpoint (0- dimensional manifold)  ▪

Since π1is a functor between manifolds and fundamental groups, we get the following sequence of the commutative diagram of fundamental groups: π1(M)F¯1π1(M1)F¯2π1(M2)limmF¯mπ1(point)r¯1r¯2 r¯3limmr¯mπ1(N)φ¯1π1(N1)φ¯2π1(N2)limmφ¯mπ1(point).

3. Conclusion

In the present paper, we achieved the limit of folding and unfolding on the fundamental group. The relation between limits of foldings and retractions on the induced fundamental groups from viewpoint of a commutative diagram is obtained. New types of folding on the fundamental groups are deduced.

Acknowledgements

The author expresses his sincere thanks to the reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions, which helped to improve the quality of the paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

References

  • Hatcher A. Algebraic topology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
  • Abu-Saleem M. Dynamical manifolds and their fundamental group. Adv Stud Contemp Math. 2010;20(1):125–131.
  • Abu-Saleem M. Folding on the wedge sum of graphs and their fundamental group. Appl Sci. 2010;12:14–19.
  • Abu-Saleem M. Dynamical chaotic homotopy group and its applications. Int J Nonlinear Sci. 2011;11(2):206–212.
  • Brazas J. The fundamental group as a topological group. Topol Appl. 2013;160:170–188. doi: 10.1016/j.topol.2012.10.015
  • McCleary J. A first course in topology: continuity and dimension. American Mathematical Society. 2006.
  • Neto O, Silva PC. The fundamental group of an algebric link. C R Acad Sci Paris I. 2005;340:141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2004.12.014
  • Massey WS. Algebraic topology: an introduction. Harcourt Brace and World New York; 1967.
  • Abu-Saleem M. On dynamical chaotic de sitter spaces and their deformation retracts. Proc Jangjeon Math Soc. 2011;14:231–238.
  • Robertson SA. Isometric folding of Riemannian manifolds. Proc Roy Soc Edinburgh. 1977;77:275–289.
  • El-Kholy E. Isometric and topological folding of manifold. Ph.D. Thesis, Southampton University; 1981.
  • El-Ghoul M. Unfolding of Riemannian manifold. Commun Fac Sci Univ Ankara Series A. 1988;37:1–4.
  • Abu-Saleem M. Folding on the chaotic Cartesian product of manifolds and their fundamental group. Tamkang J Math. 2008;39(4):353–361.
  • Abu-Saleem M. Conditional fractional folding of a manifold and their fundamental group. Adv Stud Contemporary Math. 2010;20(2):271–277.
  • Abu-Saleem M. Homology group on manifolds and their folding. Tamkang J Math. 2010;41(1):31–38.
  • Ameen ZA. On types of generalized closed sets. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2018;12(3):290–293. doi: 10.1080/16583655.2018.1468397
  • Al-shami TM. Supra semi-compactness via supra topological spaces. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2018;12(3):338–343. doi: 10.1080/16583655.2018.1469835