1,309
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Lyapunov type inequalities and their applications for quasilinear impulsive systems

ORCID Icon
Pages 711-721 | Received 16 Nov 2018, Accepted 13 May 2019, Published online: 08 Jun 2019

ABSTRACT

A novel Lyapunov-type inequality for Dirichlet problem associated with the quasilinear impulsive system involving the (pj,qj)-Laplacian operator for j=1,2 is obtained. Then utility of this new inequality is exemplified in finding disconjugacy criterion, obtaining lower bounds for associated eigenvalue problems and investigating boundedness and asymptotic behaviour of oscillatory solutions. The effectiveness of the obtained disconjugacy criterion is illustrated via an example. Our results not only improve the recent related results but also generalize them to the impulsive case.

1. Introduction

In this paper, we obtain a Lyapunov type inequality for the following Dirichlet problem associated with the quasilinear impulsive system involving the (pj,qj)-Laplacian operator for j=1,2 (1) h1(t)up12um1(t)uq12u=f(t)uα2uvβ,tτih2(t)vp22vm2(t)vq22v=g(t)uθvγ2v,tτiΔh1(t)up12u+m1(t)uq12ut=τi=aiuα2uvβ,iN,Δh2(t)vp22v+m2(t)vq22vt=τi=biuθvγ2v,iN.(1) Throughout this section, we assume that

  1. hj,mj,f,gPLC[t0,)={ω:[t0,)R is continuous on each interval (τi,τi+1), the limits w(τi±) exist and w(τi)=w(τi) for iN}, hj,mj>0,j=1,2,

  2. pj,qj>1,j=1,2 and α,β,γ,θ>0 are real numbers,

  3. {τi} is a strictly increasing sequence of real numbers for iN,

  4. ai,bi are sequence of real numbers for iN.

Definition 1.1

By a solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation1) on the interval [t0,), we mean a nontrivial pair of continuous functions (u(t),v(t)) defined on [t0,) such that (h1|u|p12u),(m1|u|q12u),(h2|v|p22v),(m2|v|q22v)PLC[t0,) satisfying (Equation1) for tt0.

Definition 1.2

[Citation24]

The solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation1) has a zero at the point c if both components of the solution w have a zero at this point.

We also need the following definitions.

Definition 1.3

[Citation24]

System (Equation1) is called disconjugate on an interval [a,b] if and only if there is no real nontrivial solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation1) having two or more zeros on [a,b].

Definition 1.4

[Citation24]

A nontrivial solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation1) is bounded on [t0,) if both components of w are bounded on [t0,). If at least one component of w is not bounded on [t0,), then this solution is called unbounded.

Definition 1.5

[Citation24]

A nontrivial solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation1) is said to be oscillatory if both components of w are oscillatory on [T0,), i.e if for each T>T0 there is a point T1(T,) such that u(T1)=v(T1)=0. If either at least one component of w is not oscillatory or they are oscillatory but they become zero at different points, this solution is called nonoscillatory.

Definition 1.6

[Citation24]

A nontrivial solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation1) tends to zero as t if both components of w tend to zero as t. If at least one component of w does not approach zero as t, then this solution does not approach zero as t.

Lyapunov type inequality is one of the main tools to investigate asymptotic behaviours, such as oscillation, disconjugacy, stability, of solutions of differential equations and to analyse boundary and eigenvalue problems. It was established by Lyapunov [Citation1] and generalized to linear impulsive case in [Citation2]. For a comprehensive exibition of the results, we refer two surveys [Citation3,Citation4] and references therein. The half linear version of Lyapunov inequality was obtained in [Citation5–9]. To the best of our knowledge, although many results have been obtained for quasilinear systems [Citation10–23], there is little known for the impulsive quasilinear systems [Citation24]. Although there is a large body of literature on quasilinear systems that we can not cover completely, the results in [Citation10,Citation11,Citation24] and in [Citation22] are worth mentioning due to their contribution to these subject.

Recall that the numbers μ,μ>1 are said to be conjugate if 1μ+1μ=1. In the sequel, we denote r+(t)=max{r(t),0} and ri+=max{ri,0}.

Theorem 1.7

[Citation10]

In system (Equation1), let h1(t)=h2(t)=1,m1(t)=m2(t)=0,f(t),g(t)>0, α=θ,β=γ, αp1+βp2=1, ai=bi=0,iN, and p1 and p2 be conjugate numbers for p1 and p2, respectively. If system (Equation1) has a real nontrivial solution (u(t),v(t)) such that u(a)=u(b)=v(a)=v(b)=0, a,bR with a<b are consecutive zeros, and u,v are not identically zero on [a,b], then we have the following Lyapunov type inequality 2α+β(ba)αp1+βp2abf(t)dtαp1abg(t)dtβp2.

Theorem 1.8

[Citation11]

In system (Equation1), let m1(t)=m2(t)=0,αp1+βp2=1, θp1+γp2=1, ai=bi=0,iN, and p1 and p2 be conjugate numbers for p1 and p2, respectively. If system (Equation1) has a real solution (u(t),v(t)) such that u(a)=u(b)=v(a)=v(b)=0, a,bR with a<b are consecutive zeros, and u,v are not identically zero on [a,b], then we have the following Lyapunov type inequality 2θ+βabh11p1(t)dtθp1abh21p2(t)βp2×abf+(t)dtθp1abg+(t)dtβp2.

Theorem 1.9

[Citation24]

In system (Equation1), let m1(t)=m2(t)=0 and p1 and p2 be conjugate numbers for p1 and p2, respectively and (e1,e2) be a nontrivial solution of the homogenous system (2) e1(αp1)+e2θ=0e1β+e2(γp2)=0,(2) where ek0 for k=1, 2 and e12+e22>0. If the system (Equation1) has a real nontrivial solution (u(t),v(t)) such that u(a)=u(b)=v(a)=v(b)=0, a,bR with a<b are consecutive zeros, and u,v are not identically zero on [a,b], then we have the following Lyapunov type inequality 2e1p1+e2p2abh1p1/p1(t)dte1p1p1×abh2p2/p2(t)dte2p2p2×abf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+e1×abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+e2.

Theorem 1.10

[Citation22]

In system (Equation1), let h1(t)=h2(t)=m1(t)=m2(t)=1,f(t),g(t)0,α=θ,β=γ, ai=bi=0,iN and 2αp1+q1+2βp2+q2=1. If the system (Equation1) has a real nontrivial solution (u(t),v(t))C2[a,b]×C2[a,b] such that u(a)=u(b)=v(a)=v(b)=0,a,bR with a<b are consecutive zeros, and u,v are not identically zero on [a,b], then we have the following Lyapunov type inequality 12abf(t)dt2αp1+q112abg(t)dt2βp2+q2min2p1(ba)p11,2q1(ba)q112αp1+q1×min2p2(ba)p21,2q2(ba)q212βp2+q2.

Since our main interest is Lyapunov type inequality for system (Equation1), we assume the existence of nontrivial solution of this system. Our main purpose is to establish Lyapunov type inequality for the impulsive system of differential equations (Equation1) satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions. Although our motivation comes from the papers of [Citation11,Citation22,Citation24], our results not only extend the results of such papers to the impulsive case but also improve them.

1.1. Lyapunov type inequality

In the sequel, we assume that (3) 2αp1+q1+2βp2+q2=1and2θp1+q1+2γp2+q2=1.(3) For the sake of convenience, we define the following integral operator M(s,k,μ)=as(k(t))μμdt1μ+sb(k(t))μμdt1μ, where s(a,b), k is a real-valued continuous function such that k(t)>0 for all tR, and μ,μ>1 are conjugate numbers.

Remark 1.1

For a given number μ and function k, set F(s)=M(s,k,μ) for s(a,b). F(s) obtains its minimum at the point s(a,b) such that as(k(t))μμdt=sb(k(t))μμdt holds. Thus, we have F(s)Fmin(s)=2as(k(t))μμdt1μ=2N(s,k,μ).

Remark 1.2

Since the function h(t)=t1μ is convex for t>0, Jensen's inequality h(y+z2)[h(y)+h(z)] with y=ac(h1(t))p1p1dt and z=cb(h1(t))p1p1dt implies M(c,h1,p1)=ac(h1(t))p1p1dt1p1+cb(h1(t))p1p1dt1p12p1ab(h1(t))p1p1dt1p1=2p1N(b,h1,p1). Similarly, we obtain M(c,mj,qj)2qjab(mj(t))qjqjdt1qj=2qjN(b,mj,qj), j=1,2 and M(d,h2,p2)2p2ab(h2(t))p2p2dt1p2=2p2N(b,h2,p2).

Now we are ready to give the main result of this paper as follows.

Theorem 1.11

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj, j=1,2, respectively and (e1,e2) be a nontrivial solution of the homogenous system (4) e1αp1+q12+e2θ=0,e1β+e2γp2+q22=0,(4) where ek0 for k=1, 2 and e12+e22>0. If the system (Equation1) has a real nontrivial solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) such that w(a)=w(b)=0, a,bR with a<b are consecutive zeros, then we have the following Lyapunov type inequality (5) abf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+e1×abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+e22e1+e2min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2)e2.(5)

Proof.

Multiplying the first equation of system (Equation1) by u and integrating from a to b and using f+(t)=max{f(t),0} and ai+=max{ai,0}, we have (6) abh1(t)|u(t)|p1dt+abm1(t)|u(t)|q1dtabf+(t)|u(t)|α|v(t)|βdt+aτi<bai+|u(τi)|α|v(τi)|β.(6) Let |u(c)|=maxatbu(t) and |v(d)|=maxatbv(t), then from (Equation6), we have (7) abh1(t)|u(t)|p1dt+abm1(t)|u(t)|q1dtu(c)αv(d)βabf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+.(7) Similarly from the second equation of system (Equation1) and by using g+(t)=max{g(t),0} and bi+=max{bi,0}, we get abh2(t)|u(t)|p2dt+abm2(t)|u(t)|q2dtu(c)θv(d)γabg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+. On the other hand by employing Hölder inequality with indices p1 and p1, one can obtain u(c)=acu(t)dtacu(t)dt=ach11p1(t)h11p1(t)u(t)dtach1p1p1(t)dt1p1ach1(t)u(t)p1dt1p1 or (8) u(c)p1ach1p1p1(t)dtp1p1ach1(t)u(t)p1dt.(8) Similarly, by using Hölder inequality with indices p1 and p1, one can obtain (9) u(c)p1cbh1p1p1(t)dtp1p1cbh1(t)u(t)p1dt.(9) Adding (Equation8) and (Equation9) together yields (10) u(c)p1ach1p1p1(t)dt1p1+cbh1p1p1(t)dt1p1abh1(t)u(t)p1dt.(10) Repeating the above procedure with v(d)=adv(t)dtadv(t)dt=adh21p2(t)h21p2(t)v(t)dtadh2p2p2(t)dt1p2adh2(t)v(t)p2dt1p2 and v(d)=dbv(t)dtdbv(t)dt=dbh21p2(t)h21p2(t)v(t)dtdbh2p2p2(t)dt1p2dbh2(t)v(t)p2dt1p2 one can obtain the following inequality (11) v(d)p2adh2p2p2(t)dt1p2+dbh2p2p2(t)dt1p2abh2(t)v(t)p2dt.(11) Moreover, the similar process implies the following inequalities (12) u(c)q1acm1q1q1(t)dt1q1+cbm1q1q1(t)dt1q1abm1(t)u(t)q1dt(12) and (13) v(d)q2adm2q2q2(t)dt1q2+dbm2q2q2(t)dt1q2abm2(t)v(t)q2dt.(13) Adding (Equation10) and (Equation12), we have u(c)p1M(c,h1,p1)+u(c)q1M(c,m1,q1)abh1(t)u(t)p1dt+abm1(t)u(t)q1dt. By using (Equation7), we get u(c)αv(d)βabf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+u(c)p1M(c,h1,p1)+u(c)q1M(c,m1,q1)u(c)p1+u(c)q1minM(c,h1,p1),M(c,m1,q1)2u(c)p12u(c)q12minM(c,h1,p1),M(c,m1,q1), where we have used A+B2AB with A=|u(c)|p1 and B=|u(c)|q1. Hence we can conclude that (14) u(c)αp1+q12v(d)βabf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+2minM(c,h1,p1),M(c,m1,q1).(14) The above process is applied to inequality (Equation11) and inequality (Equation13) to obtain the following inequality (15) u(c)θv(d)γp2+q22abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+2minM(d,h2,p2),M(d,m2,q2).(15) Raising inequalities (Equation14) and (Equation15) by e1 and e2, respectively, then multiplying the resulting inequalities yield (16) u(c)αp1+q12e1+e2θv(d)e1β+γp2+q22e2×abf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+e1×abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+e22e1+e2minM(c,h1,p1),M(c,m1,q1)e1minM(d,h2,p2),M(d,m2,q2)e2(16) Now, we choose e1 and e2 such that |u(c)| and |v(d)| cancels out, i.e. they solve the homogeneous linear system (Equation4). Based on the results obtained in Remark 1.1 and Remark 1.2 and inequality (Equation16), the desired result can be obtained.

The following corollaries provide new Lyapunov type inequalities for the particular cases of system (Equation1). Since system (Equation4) has infinitely many solutions (e1,e2), assuming different conditions on the relations between α,β,θ,γ,pj and qj,j=1,2 yields more inequalities than we will show.

Corollary 1.12

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj,j=1,2, respectively. Suppose that (17) α+θ=p1+q12,β+γ=p2+q22.(17) If system (Equation1) has a real solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) such that w(a)=w(b)=0, a,bR with a<b are consecutive zeros, then we have the following Lyapunov type inequality abf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+4min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2).

Proof.

From the proof of Theorem 1.11, we see that condition (Equation17) implies that e1=e2=1 is a nonzero solution of (Equation4). Now, Corollary 1.12 is a direct consequence of Theorem 1.11.

Corollary 1.13

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj,j=1,2, respectively. Suppose that (18) 2αp1+q1+2γp2+q2=1,βθ=αγ.(18) If system (Equation1) has a real solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) such that w(a)=w(b)=0, a,bR with a<b are consecutive zeros, then we have the following Lyapunov type inequality abf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+θ×abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+p1+q12α2p1+q12α+θ×min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)θ×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2)p1+q12α.

Proof.

From the proof of Theorem 1.11, we see that condition (Equation18) implies that e1=θ,e2=p1+q12α is a nonzero solution of (Equation4). Now, Corollary 1.13 is a direct consequence of Theorem 1.11.

Corollary 1.14

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj,j=1,2, respectively. Suppose that condition (Equation18) holds. If system (Equation1) has a real solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) such that w(a)=w(b)=0, a,bR with a<b are consecutive zeros, then we have the following Lyapunov type inequality abf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+p2+q22γ×abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+β2p2+q22γ+β×min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)p2+q22γ×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2)β.

Proof.

From the proof of Theorem 1.11, we see that condition (Equation18) implies that e1=p2+q22γ,e2=β is a nonzero solution of (Equation4). Now, Corollary 1.14 is a direct consequence of Theorem 1.11.

Corollary 1.15

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj,j=1,2, respectively, α=θ and β=γ and (e1,e2) be a nontrivial solution of the homogenous system (19) e1αp1+q12+e2α=0,e1β+e2βp2+q22=0,(19) where ek0 for k=1,2 and e12+e22>0. If the system (Equation1) has a real nontrivial solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) such that w(a)=w(b)=0, a,bR with a<b are consecutive zeros, then we have the following Lyapunov type inequality abf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+e1×abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+e22e1+e2min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2)e2.

Remark 1.3

Since no sign condition is assumed for f and g, Theorem 1.11 is an impulsive generalization and improvement of [Citation22, Theorem 2.1]. Since system (Equation1) is more general than system (15) of [Citation11] and system (6.1) of [Citation24], Theorem 1.11 extends [Citation11, Corollary 2] and [Citation24, Theorem 6.1.1].

Remark 1.4

In the absence of impulse effect, Theorem 1.11 still improves [Citation22, Theorem 2.1], which implies that Theorem 1.11 is new even for the nonimpulsive case.

Remark 1.5

In view of r+(t)|r(t)| and ri+|ri|, we may replace the Lyapunov type inequality (Equation5) by ab|f(t)|dt+aτi<b|ai|e1×ab|g(t)|dt+aτi<b|bi|e22e1+e2min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2)e2.

2. Applications

In this section, we give some applications of Lyapunov type inequalities which are used as a handy tool in studying of the qualitative nature of solutions.

2.1. Disconjugacy

In this part by using Lyapunov type inequality (Equation5) obtained in Section 1.1, we establish a disconjugacy criterion for system (Equation1).

Theorem 2.1

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj, j=1,2, respectively and (e1,e2) be a nontrivial solution of the homogenous system (Equation4). If (20) abf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+e1×abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+e2<2e1+e2min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2)e2(20) holds, then system (Equation1) is disconjugate on [a,b].

Proof.

Suppose on the contrary that there is a real solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) with nontrivial (u(t),v(t)) having two zeros s1,s2[a,b] (s1<s2) such that (u(t),v(t))0 for all t(s1,s2). Applying Theorem 1.11 we see that s1s2f+(t)dt+s1τi<s2ai+e1s1s2g+(t)dt+s1τi<s2bi+e22e1+e2min2p1N(s2,h1,p1),2q1N(s2,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(s2,h2,p2),2q2N(s2,m2,q2)e2. Since N(s,k,μ)N(b,k,μ) for sb, we obtain abf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+e1×abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+e22e1+e2min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2)e2. Clearly, the last inequality contradicts (Equation20). The proof is complete.

Remark 2.1

If we consider a particular case, where m1(t)=m2(t)=0, we obtain system (6.1) in [Citation24]. In this case, inequality (Equation5) reduces to the following form abf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+e1×abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+e22p1e1+p2e2N(b,h1,p1)e1N(b,h2,p2)e2 and disconjugacy criterion becomes exactly the same as in Theorem 6.3.1 of [Citation24]. This implies that Theorem 2.1 generalizes the previous disconjugacy criterion given in [Citation24].

Example 2.2

Let us consider system (Equation1) with h1(t)=et,h2(t)=t+1,m1(t)=t2,m2(t)=t4,f(t)=sint,g(t)=cost and p1=p2=q1=q2=2,α=β=γ=θ=1. Then condition (Equation17) is valid and e1=e2=1. Moreover if we choose a=π4, b=4π and ai=(1)ii,bi=(1)i+1i,τi=iπ2,iN, then the assumptions (i) –(iv) are satisfied. In this case system  (Equation1) is reduced to the following second-order linear system of impulsive differential equations (21) etut2u=sintsgn(u)v,tiπ2,(t+1)vt4v=costsgn(v)u,tiπ2,Δ(et+t2)ut=iπ2=(1)iisgn(u)v,iN,Δ(t4+t+1)vt=iπ2=(1)i+1isgn(v)u,iN.(21) If we compute all the terms of inequality (Equation20), then we will show that all the conditions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied. Observe that abf+(t)dt+aτi<bai+e1=π44π(sint)+dt+π4τi<4π(1)ii+4.623773448 and abg+(t)dt+aτi<bbi+e2=π44π(cost)+dt+π4τi<4π(1)i+1i+4.969083695. Therefore the left hand side of inequality (Equation20) is LHS22.97591725.

On the other hand 2e1+e2min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2)e2=64min1π/44πdtet,1π/44πdtt2×min1π/44πdtt+1,1π/44πdtt426.43874243.

Therefore the right hand side of inequality (Equation20) is RHS26.43874243. Since all the conditions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied, we can conclude that system (Equation1) is disconjugate on [π4,4π]. This result can be visualized in Figure . If we impose the initial conditions u(π4)=v(π4)=0, u(π4)=v(π4)=1 to the system (Equation21), the numerical solution of system (Equation21) can be shown as in Figure . In this figure, the red and blue curves represent the solutions u and v, respectively. These solutions have zeros only at t=π4 and they are different than zero when t>π4. Therefore, the solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation21) can not be zero when t>π4. This implies that solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation21) is disconjugate on [π4,4π]. Since the solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) is continuous at all points in [π4,4π] but its derivative has jumps at the jump points τi=iπ2,iN, the edges on the graph of solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) occur at the impulse points τi=iπ2,iN.

2.2. Eigenvalue problems

Now, we present an application of the obtained Lyapunov-type inequality for system (Equation1). By using techniques similar to the technique in Napoli and Pinasco [Citation10], we establish the following result which gives lower bounds for eigenvalues of the associated eigenvalue problem of system (Equation1). The proof of the following theorem is based on the Lyapunov type inequality derived in Theorem 1.11.

Figure 1. The graph of solutions u(t) and v(t) of system (21).

Figure 1. The graph of solutions u(t) and v(t) of system (21).

Let f(t)=λαr1(t), g(t)=μβr2(t), ai=λαci1 and bi=μβci2, where r1,r2>0 and cik>0,k=1,2. Then system (Equation1) reduces to the following impulsive eigenvalue problem (22) h1(t)up12um1(t)uq12u=λαr1(t)uα2uvβ,tτih2(t)vp22vm2(t)vq22v=μβr2(t)uθvγ2v,tτiΔh1(t)up12um1(t)uq12ut=τi=λαci1uα2uvβ,i=1,2,,mΔh2(t)vp22vm2(t)vq22vt=τi=μβci2uθvγ2v,i=1,2,,mu(a)=u(b)=v(a)=v(b)=0.(22)

Definition 2.3

A pair (λ,μ) is called an eigenvalue of (Equation22) if there is a corresponding solution (u,v) such that u,v0 on (a,b).

Theorem 2.4

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj, j=1,2, respectively and (e1,e2) be a nontrivial solution of the homogenous system (Equation4) and (23) abrk(t)dt+aτi<bcik>0,k=1,2.(23) Then there exists a function h(λ)=1β(CD(|λ|α)e1)1e2 such that |μ|h(λ) for every eigenvalue pair (λ,μ) of the system (Equation22) where the constants C and D are given as C=2e1+e2min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2)e2,D=abr1(t)dt+aτi<bci1e1×abr2(t)dt+aτi<bci1e2.

Proof.

Let (λ,μ) be an eigenvalue pair and (u,v) be the corresponding eigenfunctions of the system (Equation22). If we apply Lyapunov inequality obtained in Theorem 1.11 for system (Equation22), we get (24) Cab|λ|αr1(t)dt+aτi<b|λ|αci1e1×ab|μ|βr2(t)dt+aτi<b|μ|βci2e2=abr1(t)dt+aτi<bci1e1×abr2(t)dt+aτi<bci2e2(|λ|α)e1(|μ|β)e2.(24) For the eigenvalue μ, we can find the following lower bound as |μ|βC1e2(|λ|α)e1e2abr1(t)dt+aτi<bci1e1e2×abr2(t)dt+aτi<bci21. Also by rearranging terms in (Equation24), we obtain |λ|e1|μ|e2CDαe1βe2.

Since the proofs of following corollaries are the same as that of Theorem 2.4, they are omitted.

Corollary 2.5

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj,j=1,2, respectively. Suppose that (Equation17) and (Equation23) hold. Then there exists a function h1(λ)=1βC1D1|λ|α such that |μ|h1(λ) for every eigenvalue pair (λ,μ) of the system (Equation22) where the constants C1 and D1 are given as C1=22min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2),D1=abr1(t)dt+aτi<bci11×abr2(t)dt+aτi<bci11.

Corollary 2.6

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj,j=1,2, respectively. Suppose that (Equation18) and (Equation23) hold. Then there exists a function h2(λ)=1βC2D2(|λ|α)θ2p1+q12α such that |μ|h2(λ) for every eigenvalue pair (λ,μ) of the system (Equation22) where the constants C2 and D2 are given as C2=2p1+q12α+θ×min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)θ×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2)p1+q12α,D2=abr1(t)dt+aτi<bci1θ×abr2(t)dt+aτi<bci1αp1+q12.

Corollary 2.7

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj,j=1,2, respectively, α=θ and β=γ and (e1,e2) be a nontrivial solution of the homogenous system (Equation19). Suppose that (Equation23) holds. Then there exists a function h3(λ)=1βC3D3(|λ|α)e11e2 such that |μ|h3(λ) for every eigenvalue pair (λ,μ) of the system (Equation22) where the constants C3 and D3 are given as C3=2e1+e2min2p1N(b,h1,p1),2q1N(b,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(b,h2,p2),2q2N(b,m2,q2)e2,D3=abr1(t)dt+aτi<bci1e1×abr2(t)dt+aτi<bci1e2.

2.3. Asymptotic behaviour of oscillatory solutions

In this section as an application of Lyapunov type inequality given in Section 1.1, we establish the following results to study the asymptotic behaviour of the oscillatory solutions of system (Equation1).

Theorem 2.8

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj, j=1,2, respectively and (e1,e2) be a nontrivial solution of the homogenous system (Equation4). Let f+(t)dt+τi<ai+e1×g+(t)dt+τi<bi+e2×min2p1N(,h1,p1),2q1N(,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(,h2,p2),2q2N(,m2,q2)e2<, where N(,k,μ)=(k(t))μμdt1μ. Then every oscillatory solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation1) is bounded and approaches zero as t.

Proof.

First we prove the boundedness of oscillatory solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)). Let us suppose that w(t) is oscillatory but not bounded. Then lim supt|w(t)|=. Then for every M1, we can find T=T(M1) such that |w(t)|>M1 for all t>T. Since w is oscillatory, there exists an interval (t1,t2) with t1T such that w(t1)=w(t2)=0. By using Lyapunov inequality for t1T, we get t1t2f+(t)dt+t1τi<t2ai+e1×t1t2g+(t)dt+t1τi<t2bi+e22e1+e2min2p1N(t2,h1,p1),2q1N(t2,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(t2,h2,p2),2q2N(t2,m2,q2)e2. Since N(s,k,μ)N(t2,k,μ) for st2, we obtain asf+(t)dt+aτi<sai+e1×asg+(t)dt+aτi<sbi+e22e1+e2min2p1N(s,h1,p1),2q1N(s,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(s,h2,p2),2q2N(s,m2,q2)e2 or 2e1+e2af+(t)dt+aτi<ai+e1×ag+(t)dt+aτi<bi+e2×min2p1N(,h1,p1),2q1N(,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(,h2,p2),2q2N(,m2,q2)e21, where N(,k,μ)=(a(k(t))μμdt)1μ. Then we get e1+e20 which implies contradiction. Therefore, w is bounded. Since w is bounded, |w(t)|N for t>T for any T. If w(t) does not approach zero as t, then there exists a constant d>0 such that 2dlim supt|w(t)|N. Since w has arbitrarily large zeros, there exists an interval (t1,t2) with t1T, where T is sufficiently large, such that w(t1)=w(t2)=0. The remainder of the proof is similar to above, hence it is omitted.

The following corollaries and their proofs follow easily from Theorem 2.8 and its proof, respectively.

Corollary 2.9

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj,j=1,2, respectively. Suppose that (Equation17) holds. Let f+(t)dt+τi<ai+g+(t)dt+τi<bi+×min2p1N(,h1,p1),2q1N(,m1,q1)1×min2p2N(,h2,p2),2q2N(,m2,q2)1<, where N(,k,μ)=(k(t))μμdt1μ. Then every oscillatory solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation1) is bounded and approaches zero as t.

Corollary 2.10

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj,j=1,2, respectively. Suppose that (Equation18) holds. Let f+(t)dt+τi<ai+θ×g+(t)dt+τi<bi+p1+q12α×min2p1N(,h1,p1),2q1N(,m1,q1)θ×min2p2N(,h2,p2),2q2N(,m2,q2)αp1+q12<, where N(,k,μ)=((k(t))μμdt)1μ. Then every oscillatory solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation1) is bounded and approaches zero as t.

Corollary 2.11

Assume that the condition (Equation3) holds. Let pj and qj be conjugate numbers for pj and qj,j=1,2, respectively, α=θ and β=γ and (e1,e2) be a nontrivial solution of the homogenous system. Suppose that (Equation19) holds. Let f+(t)dt+τi<ai+e1×g+(t)dt+τi<bi+e2×min2p1N(,h1,p1),2q1N(,m1,q1)e1×min2p2N(,h2,p2),2q2N(,m2,q2)e2<, where N(,k,μ)=((k(t))μμdt)1μ. Then every oscillatory solution w(t)=(u(t),v(t)) of system (Equation1) is bounded and approaches zero as t.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

References

  • Liapounoff AM. Problème général de la stabilité du mouvement. Ann Fac Sci Toulouse Sci Math Sci Phys. 1907;2:203–474. Reprinted as Ann. Math. Studies, No, 17, Princeton, 1947..
  • Guseinov GS, Zafer A. Stability criterion for second order linear impulsive differential equations with periodic coefficients. Math Nachr. 2008;281:1273–1282. doi: 10.1002/mana.200510677
  • Cheng SS. Lyapunov inequalities for differential and difference equations. Fasc Math. 1992;23:25–41.
  • Tiryaki A. Recent developments of Lyapunov-type inequalities. Adv Dyn Syst Appl. 2010;5:231–248.
  • Pinasco JP. Lower bounds for eigenvalues of the one-dimensional p-Laplacian. Abstr Appl Anal. 2004;2:147–153. doi: 10.1155/S108533750431002X
  • Lee CF, Yeh CC, Hong CH, et al. Lyapunov and Wirtinger inequalities. Appl Math Lett. 2004;17:847–853. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2004.06.016
  • Yang X. On inequalities of Lyapunov type. Appl Math Comput. 2003;134:293–300.
  • Došlý O, Řehák P. Half-linear differential equations. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.; 2005. (North-Holland Mathematics Studies; Vol. 202).
  • Wang X. Lyapunov type inequalities for second-order half-linear differential equations. J Math Anal Appl. 2011;382:792–801. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.04.075
  • De Nápoli PL, Pinasco JP. Estimates for eigenvalues of quasilinear elliptic systems. J Differ Equ. 2006;227:102–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2006.01.004
  • Çakmak D, Tiryaki A. On Lyapunov-type inequality for quasilinear systems. Appl Math Comput. 2010;216:3584–3591.
  • Sim I, Lee YH. Lyapunov inequalities for one-dimensional p-Laplacian problems with a singular weight function. J Inequal Appl. 2010;2010:1–9. Article ID 865096. doi: 10.1155/2010/865096
  • Çakmak D, Tiryaki A. Lyapunov-type inequality for a class of Dirichlet quasilinear systems involving the (p1,p2,…,pn)-Laplacian. J Math Anal Appl. 2010;369:76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.02.043
  • Yang X, Kim YI, Lo K. Lyapunov-type inequality for a class of quasilinear systems. Math Comput Model. 2011;53:1162–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.11.083
  • Tang XH, He X. Lower bounds for generalized eigenvalues of the quasilinear systems. J Math Anal Appl. 2012;385:72–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.06.026
  • Aktas MF, Çakmak D, Tiryaki A. A note on Tang and He's paper. Appl Math Comput. 2012;218:4867–4871.
  • Çakmak D, Aktas MF, Tiryaki A. Lyapunov type inequalities for nonlinear systems involving the (p1,p2,…,pn)-Laplacian. Electron J Differ Equ. 2013;2013:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1687-1847-2013-1
  • Aktas MF. Lyapunov-type inequalities for n-dimensional quasilinear systems. Electron J Differ Equ. 2013;2013:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1687-1847-2013-1
  • Yang X, Kim Y, Lo K. Lyapunov-type inequality for n-dimensional quasilinear systems. Math Inequal Appl. 2013;16:929–934.
  • Tiryaki A, Çakmak D, Aktas MF. Lyapunov-type inequalities for a two classes of Diriclet quasilinear systems. Math Inequal Appl. 2014;17:843–863.
  • Çakmak D. On Lyapunov-type inequality for a class of quasilinear systems. Electron J Qual Theory Differ Equ. 2014;2014:1–10. doi: 10.14232/ejqtde.2014.1.9
  • Jleli M, Samet B. On Lyapunov-type inequalities for (p,q)-Laplacian systems. J Inequal Appl. 2017;2017:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13660-017-1377-0
  • Li QL, Cheung WS. Lyapunov-type inequalities for Laplacian systems and applications to boundary value problems. J Nonlinear Sci Appl. 2018;11:8–16. doi: 10.22436/jnsa.011.01.02
  • Kayar Z. Lyapunov type inequalities and their applications for linear and nonlinear systems under impulse effect [PhD dissertation]. Ankara: Middle East Technical University; 2014.