![MathJax Logo](/templates/jsp/_style2/_tandf/pb2/images/math-jax.gif)
Abstract
A module M over an associative ring R with unity is a QTAG-module if every finitely generated submodule of any homomorphic image of M is a direct sum of uniserial modules. In this paper we investigate the class of QTAG-modules whose every separable module is a direct sum of uniserial modules; such modules are called ω-totally ω-projective. We discuss an interesting characterization of this class and we show that the class of -totally
-projective modules contains the class of ω-totally ω-projective modules.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000):
1. Introduction
Many concepts for groups like purity, projectivity, injectivity, height etc. have been generalized for modules. When we generalize the results of groups for modules sometimes we find that they are not true for modules. Therefore we impose some conditions either on the module or on the underlying ring. Here we impose a condition on modules that every finitely generated submodule of any homomorphic image of the module is a direct sum of uniserial modules while the rings are associative with unity. After these conditions many elegant results of groups can be proved for QTAG-modules which are not true in general. Many results of this paper are the generalization of the paper [Citation1].
The study of QTAG-modules was initiated by Singh [Citation2]. Mehdi et al. [Citation3] worked a lot on these modules. They introduced many concepts and generalized different notions for these modules and contributed to the development of the theory of QTAG-modules. Yet there is much to explore.
All the rings R considered here are associative with unity and right modules M are unital QTAG-modules. An element is uniform, if xR is a non-zero uniform (hence uniserial) module and for any R-module M with a unique decomposition series,
denotes its decomposition length. For a uniform element
and
are the exponent and height of x in M, respectively.
denotes the submodule of M generated by the elements of height at least k and
is the submodule of M generated by the elements of exponents at most k [Citation4].
denotes the first Ulm-submodule of a module M consisting of all elements of infinite height, and
. M is h-divisible if
and it is h-reduced if it does not contain any h-divisible submodule. In other words it is free from the elements of infinite height. A module M is said to be bounded, if there exists an integer n such that
for every uniform element
[Citation5]. A module M is pure-complete if for every submodule of
there is a pure subgroup
such that
. A family of nice submodules
of submodules of M is called a nice system in M if
;
If
is any subset of
then
Given any
and any countable subset X of M, there exists
containing
, such that K/N is countably generated [Citation3].
A h-reduced QTAG-module M is called totally projective if it has a nice system.
Several results which hold for TAG-modules also hold good for QTAG-modules [Citation2]. Notations and terminology are follows from [Citation6,Citation7].
A module M is said to be Σ-module [Citation8], if every high submodule of M is the direct sum of uniserial modules (where a submodule N of a module M is high if it is maximal with the property ). In general, a submodule of a Σ-module is not necessarily a Σ-module. M is said to be a totally Σ-module if every submodule of M is also a Σ-module. We focus on the several characterizations of this class. For example, M is a totally Σ-module if and only if it is the direct sum of countably generated modules and a module which is direct sum of uniserial modules. Alternatively, we say that M is ω-totally ω-projective if every separable submodule N of M is a direct sum of uniserial modules. The class of ω-totally ω-projective modules coincide with the the class of ω-totally pure-complete modules, i.e. those modules whose every separable modules is pure complete. Precisely, this is the class of module whose every
-bounded submodule is a direct sum of countably generated modules.
If K is any module, then there is a module M such that and
is a direct sum of uniserial modules. Since for any high submodule P of M there is an embedding
, P must be a direct sum of uniserial modules, so that M will be a Σ-module containing K. On the other hand, if K is not countably generated, then M will not be a totally Σ-module. We sharpen this observation by showing that any separable module L can be embedded as a submodule in a module M of length
which is a Σ-module.
If is a class of modules and β is an ordinal, we say that M is β-totally
if every β-bounded submodule of M is in
. M is β-totally
if and only if every submodule of M has the property that all of its β-high submodules are in
(where a submodule Q of a module R is β-high if and only if it is maximal with respect to the property that
. In fact, we will focus on the case where
and
is the class of
-projective modules; recall that M is
-projective if
for all N, or equivalently, if there is a submodule
such that M/S is a direct sum of uniserial modules. Therefore, a module M is ω-projective if and only if it is a direct sum of uniserial modules. Further, if
and
are
-projective, then
and
are isomorphic if and only if
and
are isometric, i.e. there is an isomorphism that preserves the height functions on the two modules. So, if
is the class of
-projective modules and
we have that a module M is
-totally
-projective if and only if every
-bounded submodule Q of M is
-projective.
Also, if then M is
-totally
-projective if and only if it is
-projective. It is easy to verify that the class of
-totally
-projective contains the class of ω-totally ω-projective modules (Corollary 3).
As the results of this paper are motivated by Danchev and Keef [Citation1], so we will state those results before their generalization. For the better understanding of the mentioned topic here one must go through the papers [Citation9–11].
2. Main results
We start with the following:
[[Citation1], Proposition 2.1.] If G is a group, α is an ordinal and C is a class of groups, then G is α-totally C iff every subgroup has the property that every
-high subgroup of T is a member of C.
Proposition 2.1
If is a class of modules, M is a module and β is an ordinal, then M is β-totally
if and only if every submodule N of M has the property that every β-high submodule of N is in
.
Proof.
Suppose every β-high submodule of a submodule of M is in . If B is any β-bounded submodule of M, then B is a β-high submodule of itself. Therefore it must be in
, so that M is β-totally
. Conversely, suppose that M is β-totally
and N is an arbitrary submodule of M. If B is an β-high submodule of N, then B is β-bounded, so by hypothesis,
completing the proof.
[[Citation1], Lemma 2.2.] Suppose G and H are groups, H has infinite cardinality κ, P is a subgroup of H such that H/P is -cyclic and there is an injective homomorphism
such that (1) for every
and (2) for every
(
has cardinality at least κ. Then φ extends to an injective homomorphism
Lemma 2.1
Suppose M and S are modules where the cardinality of the generating set of S is infinite κ, Q is a submodule of S such that S/Q is a direct sum of uniserial modules and there is an injective homomorphism such that (i) for every
,
and (ii) for every n>0,
has cardinality at least κ. Then π extends to an injective homomorphism
Proof.
Without loss of generality we can assume that S/Q has cardinality κ and let , and for
let
thus
We inductively extend π to an injection
so that
implies that
have the same value as
on
Assume we have constructed
for all
If γ is a limit ordinal, then we clearly need to take just unions. On the other hand if γ is isolated and
has exponent n in
such that
and
is defined. By condition (i), we have
Let
such that
where
has rank
. By condition (ii), there is an element
Choose
such that
We let
agree with
on
and
To show
is an injection, suppose
and
Let
where
and t is an integer. Clearly,
, if this failed, then for some integer l we would have lt=n−1 modulo the exponent of b. Therefore
which contradicts *. Therefore
, so that
, and hence
. Since
is injective, we have z=0, as required. Setting
, which completes the proof.
Recall that M is ω-totally -projective means that every separable submodule of M is
-projective.
[[Citation1], Proposition 2.3.] If and G is ω-totally
-projective, then
is countable.
Proposition 2.2
If n>0 and M is ω-totally -projective, then
is countably generated.
Proof.
Suppose on contrary that is not countably generated. Let Q be a separable module of cardinality
which is
-projective but not
-projective. Let S be a submodule of Q with
and Q/S is a direct sum of uniserial modules. Since
is not countably generated, there is a submodule
of
which is isomorphic to S such that
is not countably generated. By Lemma 2.1, the isomorphism of S and
extends to an embedding
. Since Q is separable and not
-projective, we can conclude that M is not ω-totally
-projective, contrary to our assumption.
Since an -totally
-projective module is ω-totally
-projective, we have the following:
Corollary 2.1
If and M is
-totally
-projective, then
is countably generated.
Corollary 2.2
If and M is ω-totally
-projective, then M is a direct sum of countably generated modules if and only if
is a direct sum of uniserial modules.
[[Citation1], Theorem 2.6.] If G is a group, then the following are equivalent:
G is a totally Σ-group;
G is ω-totally Σ-cyclic;
G is a Σ-group and
is countable;
is Σ-cyclic and
is countable;
, where C is countable and M is Σ-cyclic;
G is ω-totally pure-complete;
For all
is an
-totally dsc-griup;
For some
is an
-totally dsc-griup;
Now we discuss the main result of the paper, which characterizes the class of modules that are ω-totally ω-projective.
Theorem 2.1
If M is a module, then the following statements are equivalent:
M is a totally Σ-module;
M is ω-totally ω-projective;
M is a Σ-module and
is countably generated;
is a direct sum of uniserial modules and
is countably generated;
, where H is countably generated and K is a direct sum of uniserial modules;
M is ω-totally pure-complete;
For all
is an
-totally direct sum of countably generated modules;
For some
is an
-totally direct sum of countably generated modules.
Proof.
The equivalence of (i) and (ii) follows from Proposition 2.1. Now suppose that M is a totally Σ-module. Clearly, if M is a totally Σ-module, then it is a Σ-module. Therefore is countably generated, by Proposition 2.2, which is (iii). Next, suppose M is a Σ-module with
is countably generated and we show that
is a direct sum of uniserial modules. Suppose L is a h-high submodule of M, so L is a direct sum of uniserial modules. Since
embeds as an essential submodule of M/L, it gives that M/L is countably generated. As
is a surjection, so
is also countably generated. Since there exists a short exact sequence
it gives that
is a direct sum of uniserial modules which is (iv). The equivalence of (iv) and (v) are elementary. Now suppose M satisfies (iv) and (v) and we show that (ii) holds. If P is any separable submodule of M, then
embeds in
, and since
is a direct sum of uniserial modules, it follows that
is a direct sum of uniserial modules. As
is countably generated, implying that P is a direct sum of uniserial modules, as required.
Now we will show the equivalence of (ii) and (vi). For this, note that if M is ω-totally ω-projective and Q is a separable submodule of M, then Q must be a direct sum of uniserial modules. Since any module which is a direct sum of uniserial modules, is pure-complete, it follows that M is ω-totally pure-complete. For the reverse implication we will use the method of contrapositive proof. Let M be not ω-totally ω-projective, so it has a separable submodule P which is not a direct sum of uniserial modules. By virtue of the “core class property” from [Citation6], one may infer that P contains a submodule Q which is -projective but not a direct sum of uniserial modules. Since a pure-complete
-projective module must be a direct sum of uniserial modules, therefore P is not pure-complete implying that M is not ω-totally pure-complete.
For completing the proof of the theorem, it remains to show the equivalence of (vii) and (viii) with the help of other conditions. Suppose that M is ω-totally ω-projective. It gives that every submodule of M must be ω-totally ω-projective, and hence a countably generated module. In particular, for every every
-bounded submodule of M is a direct sum of countably generated modules, i.e. M is an
-totally direct sum of countably generated module and hence (vii) follows. Clearly (vii) implies (viii). Suppose (viii) holds for some n>0. It follows that every separable submodule of M is separable and countably generated module, i.e. every separable submodule of M is a direct sum of uniserial modules, which is (ii), completing the proof.
Corollary 2.3
If M is ω-totally ω-projective, then for n>0 M is -totally
-projective.
Proof.
If M is ω-totally ω-projective, then it is an -totally direct sum of countably generated modules, and since a
- bounded direct sum of countably generated module is
-projective, M must be
-totally
-projective.
[[Citation1], Proposition 2.9.] If S is any separable group, then there is a Σ-group G of length containing S as a subgroup.
Proposition 2.3
If P is any separable module, then there is a Σ-module M of length containing P as a submodule.
Proof.
Suppose Q is any direct sum of countably generated module of length for which there is an isomorphism
. Let
Since
and
we may treat P and Q as submodules of M such that M=P+Q and
As
and
is separable, it gives that
so that M has length
. If L is a high submodule of M, then
so that
as well. Since
is the kernel of the composite homomorphism
it follows that this is an embedding. However, since
is direct sum of uniserial modules, we have that L is also a direct sum of uniserial modules, so that M is a Σ-module.
It is interesting to note that in the above Proposition if P is not a direct sum of uniserial modules, then M is a Σ-module which is not a totally Σ-module.
[[Citation1], Lemma 2.10.] Suppose G is a group such that is
-projective. Then the following are equivalent:
There is a group decomposition
where H is separable and
is Σ-cyclic;
is
-projective.
contains a cofree subspace of
Lemma 2.2
Suppose M is a module such that and
are
-projective, then there is a module decomposition
, where K is separable and
is direct sum of countably generated modules.
Proof.
Suppose M is a module such that and
are
-projective. So that there is a decomposition
where K is separable and L is a direct sum of countably generated modules [Citation3]. Suppose
be submodules of M such that
and
. Clearly,
is separable, so that
implying that for every
there is an element
such that
. We will show that
by induction on n. Trivially it holds for n=0. Next, suppose it holds for n and let
Considering
there is an element
such that
This means that
, for some
Therefore,
for some
, so that
, as required. Therefore we infer that
so that
and hence
with bottom row as -pure, and since K is
-projective, we have
Finally,
is direct sum of uniserial modules.
As an immediate consequence we have the following:
Corollary 2.4
Suppose M is a module such that is
-projective.
If
is countably generated, then M is the direct sum of a separable
-projective module and a countably generated module.
If
is countably generated, then M is the direct sum of a
-projective module and a countably generated module.
Proof.
is
-projective implies that
is
-projective. By Lemma 2.2, M can be expressed as
, where K is separable
-projective module and Q is a module such that
is direct sum of uniserial modules.
Since
is countably generated, it follows that Q can be expressed as a direct sum of countably generated module and a module which is direct sum of uniserial modules, which is (i).
Clearly
is a direct sum of countably generated modules and
is countably generated. Thus, Q is itself a direct sum of countably generated modules, which can be written as a direct sum of countably generated module and a direct sum of uniserial modules of length
, which is
-projective.
[[Citation1], Proposition 2.12.] An -totally
-projective group G is a direct sum of a
-projective group and a countable group iff
is
-projective.
We end this article by extending Theorem 2.1 , for n=1 in the following way:
Proposition 2.4
An -totally
-projective module M is a direct sum of a
-projective module and a countably generated module if and only if
is
-projective.
Proof.
If M is the direct sum of a -projective module and a countably generated module, say
, then it follows that
is
-projective, as well. On the other hand, suppose M is a
-totally
-projective module such that
is
-projective. The required decomposition follows from Proposition 2.2 and Corollary 2.4 (ii).
Acknowledgments
We thank the anonymous referee for his/her careful reading of our manuscript and his/her many insightful comments and suggestions.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
ORCID
Fahad Sikander http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6560-8525
Tanveer Fatima http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1444-8335
References
- Danchev PV, Keef PW. An application of set theory to ω+n-Totally pω+n-projective primary abelian groups. Mediterr J Math. 2011;8:525–542. doi:10.1007/s00009-010-0088-2
- Singh S. Some decomposition theorems in Abelian groups and their generalizations, Ring theory, Proc. Ohio Univ. Cong., New York: Marcel Dekker; 1976, p. 183–185.
- Mehdi A, Abbasi MY, Mehdi F. On (ω+n)-projective modules. Ganita Sandesh. 2006;20(1):27–32.
- Khan MZ. Modules behaving like torsion Abelian groups. Math Japonica. 1978;22(5):513–518.
- Singh S. Some decomposition theorems in Abelian groups and their generalizations II. Osaka J Math. 1979;16:45–55.
- Fuchs L. Infinite abelian groups. New York: Academic Press; 1970.
- Fuchs L. Infinite abelian groups. New York: Academic Press; 1973.
- Naji SARK. A study of different structures of QTAG-modules [Ph.D. Thesis]. Aligarh: A.M.U.; 2011.
- Danchev P. On ω1−n− simply presented abelian p-groups. J Algebra Appl. 2015;14(3):1550032.
- Keef PW, Danchev PV. On n-simply presented primary abelian groups. Houston J Math. 2012;38(4):1027–1050.
- Keef PW. On ω1−pω+n-projective primary abelian groups. J Algebra Number Theory Acad. 2010;1(1):41–75.